InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
OFAC publishes additional guidance related to sanctioned virtual currency “mixer”
On September 13, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control published new cyber-related frequently asked questions concerning transactions involving a virtual currency mixer sanctioned last month for allegedly laundering more than $7 billion in virtual currency since 2019. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the company “repeatedly failed to impose effective controls designed to stop it from laundering funds for malicious cyber actors on a regular basis,” and provided financial, material, or technological support for, or in support of, cyber-enabled activity contributing to a significant threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economic health or financial stability of the U.S. The FAQs outline requirements for completing virtual currency transactions without violating U.S. sanctions regulations, discuss whether OFAC reporting obligations apply to transactions involving unsolicited and nominal amounts of virtual currency, and reiterate that transactions involving identified virtual currency wallet addresses are prohibited absent a specific OFAC license. The FAQs noted that as part of the SDN List entry, OFAC included as identifiers certain virtual currency wallet addresses associated with the company as well as the company’s URL address. OFAC provided additional clarification on interactions with open-source code that does not involve a prohibited transaction with the sanctioned company.
OFAC sanctions individuals and entities connected to IRGC-QF
On September 14, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions as part of a joint action with the DOJ, Department of State, FBI, U.S. Cyber Command, National Security Agency, and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, against ten individuals and two entities for their roles in conducting malicious cyber acts, including ransomware activity. The individuals and entities designated are affiliated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which “is known to exploit software vulnerabilities in order to carry out their ransomware activities, as well as engage in unauthorized computer access, data exfiltration, and other malicious cyber activities.” OFAC also noted that a joint cyber security advisory was published to highlight continued malicious cyber activity by advanced persistent threat actors that the authoring agencies assess are affiliated with IRGC. As a result of the sanctions, all property, and interests in property of the designated individuals and entities, “and of any entities that are owned, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more by them, individually, or with other blocked persons, that are in the United States or in the possession or control of U.S. persons, must be blocked and reported to OFAC.” U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with the designated persons. OFAC further warned that engaging in certain transactions with the individuals and entities designated today entails risk of additional sanctions.
OFAC sanctions Iranians involved in production of UAVs to Russia
On September 8, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions pursuant to Executive Orders 13382 and 14024 against an Iran-based air transportation service provider, as well as three companies and one individual involved in the research, development, production, and procurement of Iranian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and UAV components. Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Brian E. Nelson reiterated that the U.S. “is committed to strictly enforcing our sanctions against both Russia and Iran and holding accountable Iran and those supporting Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine,” and stressed that the U.S. will “not hesitate to target producers and procurers who contribute to Iran and its IRGC’s UAV program, further demonstrating [the U.S.’s] resolve to continue going after terrorist proxies that destabilize the Middle East.” The sanctions follow designations implemented by OFAC last year against members of a network of companies and individuals that provided critical support to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Qods Force’s use of UAVs (previously covered by InfoBytes here).
As a result of the sanctions, all property and interests in property belonging to the sanctioned individuals and entities subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked and must be reported to OFAC. U.S. persons are also generally prohibited from engaging in any dealings involving the property or interests in property of blocked or designated persons. Additionally, OFAC warned that “any foreign financial institution that knowingly facilitates a significant transaction or provides significant financial services for any of the individuals or entities designated today could be subject to U.S. correspondent or payable-through account sanctions.”
OFAC sanctions Iran’s MOIS over cyber activities
On September 9, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13694 against Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) and its Minister of Intelligence for conducting malicious cyber-enabled activities targeting government and private-sector organizations and across various critical infrastructure sectors, including the U.S. and its allies. OFAC noted that in July, MOIS and the Iranian government sponsored cyber-threat actors who disrupted the Albanian government computer systems. OFAC previously flagged MOIS pursuant to E.O.s 13224, 13472, and 13553 for supporting multiple terrorist groups, as well as for commissioning serious human rights abuses against the Iranian people.
As a result of the sanctions, all property and interests in property belonging to the sanctioned targets that are in the U.S. or in the possession or control of U.S. persons, and “any entities that are owned 50 percent or more by one or more designated persons” are blocked. Additionally, U.S. persons are prohibited from engaging in any dealings involving the property or interests in property of blocked or designated persons, unless exempt or authorized by a general or specific OFAC license. Additionally, OFAC warned that “any foreign financial institution that knowingly conducts or facilitates a significant transaction for or on behalf of the persons designated today could be subject to U.S. correspondent or payable-through account sanctions.”
Treasury says financial system is critical in addressing climate change
On September 9, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Under Secretary for Domestic Finance Nellie Liang spoke at the Office of Financial Research’s Climate Implications for Financial Stability Conference discussing the Department’s efforts to assess climate-related risks to the economy, financial institutions, and investors. Pointing to several studies showing the increasing economic and financial costs of climate change, Liang noted that the financial system has a “critical role to play” in addressing climate-related financial risks and that regulators and standard setters have a “responsibility to make the financial system more resilient to climate change.” In particular, Liang identified a Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) report that contained numerous recommendations for its members to consider to address climate change-related threats to financial stability. She also discussed interagency working groups created by FSOC to “bring together the agencies and leverage their efforts to improve data quality and availability, data infrastructure, climate risk metrics, and scenario analysis.” According to Liang, ongoing research—such as that presented at the event regarding how a bank’s climate commitments, the tax code, or borrowers’ scope disclosures “affect the[] cost and availability of credit, and the sensitivity of market-based measures of financial firms’ stress to climate risks”—is “important for regulators and policymakers to better understand private behavior and how incentives can help to manage climate-related financial risks.”
Treasury issues guidance on Russian oil sales cap
On September 9, the U.S. Treasury Department announced preliminary guidance on implementing a maritime services policy and related price exception for seaborne Russian oil. As previously covered by InfoBytes, OFAC recently announced that it planned to publish preliminary guidance on implementing the price cap to provide a high-level overview of the directive, including how U.S. persons can comply in advance of formal guidance and legal implementation. According to the preliminary guidance, the policy is intended to establish a framework for Russian oil to be exported by sea under a capped price, and establish a ban on services for any shipments of seaborne Russian oil above the capped price. Objectives of the guidance include: (i) maintaining a reliable supply of seaborne Russian oil to the global market; (ii) reducing upward pressure on energy prices; and (iii) reducing the revenues the Russian Federation earns from oil after its own war of choice in Ukraine has inflated global energy prices. The policy contains an exception, which applies to “jurisdictions or actors that purchase seaborne Russian oil at or below a price cap to be established by the coalition (the “price exception”).” The policy, which relates to a broad range of services in connection with the maritime transportation of Russian Federation origin crude oil and petroleum products, will become effective December 5, 2022 for the maritime transportation of crude oil and on February 5, 2023 for the maritime transportation of petroleum products.
Treasury discusses combating corruption
On September 7, U.S. Treasury Department Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes Elizabeth Rosenberg spoke at the Brookings Institution as part of a series of discussions regarding corruption and the Department’s efforts to strengthen global beneficial ownership standards against corruption. During her remarks, she discussed Treasury’s focus on three efforts to counter corruption: (i) analyzing the risks associated with corruption; (ii) putting in place an effective legal framework to prevent corruption in our financial system; and (iii) implementing targeted measures, such as sanctions, to expose and hold accountable corrupt individuals and their facilitators. She noted that her office’s 2022 Money Laundering Risk Assessment “described the persistent themes of corrupt individuals engaging in fraud, embezzlement, bribery, extortion, and the misuse of companies and other legal entities.” (Covered by InfoBytes here.) Rosenberg also discussed strengthening global beneficial ownership standards at the intergovernmental Financial Action Task Force “to focus the body’s efforts on the effective implementation of the UN Convention on Corruption, on the misuse of citizenship-by-investment programs by corrupt individuals and their families, and on financial gatekeepers that get rich helping senior officials steal from their citizens.” She further described Treasury efforts, both public and non-public, to expose corrupt officials. She closed her prepared remarks by committing to continue both defensive and offensive strategies to counter corruption and to advance rules that are designed to “make our financial system more resilient and bring forward new analysis on vulnerabilities to corruption in our economy.”
OFAC amends cyber-related sanctions regulations
On September 2, the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced that it is amending, and reissuing in their entirety, the Cyber-Related Sanctions Regulations. OFAC noted that this administrative action replaces regulations that were published in abbreviated form on December 31, 2015, with a more comprehensive set of regulations that includes additional interpretive and definitional guidance, general licenses, and other regulatory provisions that will provide further guidance to the public. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the regulations prohibited all transactions described in Executive Order (E.O.) 13694, including dealing in the property or interests in property, that come within the United States, of blocked persons. Among other things, under E.O. 13694, a party may be blocked if the U.S. government finds the party “to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, cyber-enabled activities originating from, or directed by persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the U.S. that are reasonably likely to result in, or have materially contributed to, a significant threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economic health or financial stability of the United States” and that have one of the purposes or effects enumerated in the order. The sanctions became effective September 6.
Additionally, OFAC noted that “the publication of this final rule has triggered an automatic administrative update to a number of sanctions entries.” OFAC listed unique identifier numbers (UIDs) for the affected entries as part of the administrative update and provided FAQs to clarify UIDs.
House Oversight seeks info from digital asset exchanges, financial regulators
On August 30, the Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform announced that Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Chair of the Subcommittee, sent letters to the U.S. Treasury Department, SEC, CFTC, and FTC, in addition to five digital asset exchanges, requesting information on how they are combating cryptocurrency-related fraud and scams. According to his letters, Chairman Krishnamoorthi is “concerned about the growth of fraud and consumer abuse linked to cryptocurrencies.” He further added that “[t]he lack of a central authority to flag suspicious transactions in many situations, the irreversibility of transactions, and the limited understanding many consumers and investors have of the underlying technology make cryptocurrency a preferred transaction method for scammers.” In the letters to the federal agencies, he stated that “the federal government has been slow to curb cryptocurrency scams and fraud,” and that “[e]xisting federal regulations do not comprehensively or clearly cover cryptocurrencies under all circumstances.” In one of the letters to the digital asset exchanges, Krishnamoorthi noted that “cryptocurrency exchanges must themselves act to protect consumers conducting transactions through their platforms.” The letters requested that all recipients provide information to the subcommittee outling “steps they are taking to combat cryptocurrency-related fraud and scams and additional actions that are needed to protect Americans” in order to “help Congress understand what they are doing to protect consumers and inform legislative solutions to bring stability to the digital asset industry.”
Treasury caps Russian oil sales; OFAC guidance coming soon
On September 2, the U.S. Treasury Department announced that G7 Finance Ministers confirmed their joint intention to implement a price cap on Russian-origin crude oil and petroleum products. According to the statement, G7 countries, along with other allies and partners, “plan to prohibit the provision of services that enable maritime transportation of such oil and products unless purchased at or below a price level determined by the coalition of countries adhering to and implementing the price cap.” Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen issued a statement commending the action. She noted that the price cap will “help deliver a major blow for Russian finances and will both hinder Russia’s ability to fight its unprovoked war in Ukraine and hasten the deterioration of the Russian economy,” while also maintaining supplies to global energy markets by keeping Russian oil flowing at lower prices.
In conjunction with the announcement, OFAC said it plans to publish preliminary guidance on implementing the price cap later this month. The guidance will provide a high-level overview of the mechanism, including how U.S. persons can comply in advance of formal guidance and legal implementation which will be issued at a later date.