InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
FIO joins global green initiative
On February 17, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Federal Insurance Office (FIO) announced that it joined the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). As previously covered by InfoBytes, Treasury announced in August 2021 a request for information seeking public comments on the FIO’s future work related to the insurance sector and climate-related financial risks. This was in response to an executive order issued by President Biden instructing financial regulators to mitigate climate-related risk related to the financial system (covered by InfoBytes here). According to the recent announcement, the FIO “intends to publish a climate report by the year’s end focusing on insurance supervision and regulation, with an assessment of climate-related issues or gaps in the supervision and regulation of insurers, including their potential impacts on U.S. financial stability.” The same day, the Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance (FACI), which provides advice and recommendations to assist the FIO in carrying out its statutory authorities, launched the Climate Related Financial Risk Subcommittee to support the FACI provision of information relevant to the FIO’s work on climate-related risks in the insurance sector.
OFAC removes Burundi sanctions regulations
On February 10, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a final rule to remove the Burundi Sanctions Regulations. According to OFAC, the action is being taken “because the national emergency on which part 554 was based was terminated by the President on November 18, 2021.” The final rule took effect on February 11.
E.O. blocks property of Afghan bank
On February 11, President Biden issued an Executive Order (E.O.) on Protecting Certain Property of Da Afghanistan Bank [DAB] for the Benefit of the People of Afghanistan. The E.O. generally blocks “[a]ll property and interests in property of DAB that are held, as of the date of this order, in the United States by any United States financial institution, including the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.” The E.O. establishes that “[a]ny transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.” Among other things, the order's prohibitions “apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the date of this order.” The E.O. also prohibits any transactions by U.S. persons—or within the U.S—that evade or avoid, have the purpose of evading or avoiding, cause a violation of, or attempt to violate the provisions set forth in the order, as well as any conspiracy to violate any of these prohibitions. Additionally, the Secretary of the Treasury—after consulting with heads of other executive departments as deemed appropriate—is authorized to take actions, including promulgating rules and regulations, to carry out the purposes of the E.O.
OFAC sanctions drug traffickers
On February 10, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions pursuant to Executive Order 14059 against two individuals for materially contributing to the illicit activities of major Mexican cartels to traffic drugs into the U.S. According to OFAC, the action, which was the result of collaboration between OFAC and the Drug Enforcement Administration, provides that all property and interests in property of sanctioned individuals in the U.S. or in the possession or control of U.S. persons must be blocked and reported to OFAC. OFAC notes that its regulations generally prohibit all transactions by U.S. persons that involve any property or interests in property of designated or otherwise blocked persons.
Treasury releases study on illicit finance in the high-value art market
On February 4, the U.S. Treasury Department published a study examining the high-value art market’s money laundering and terrorist financing risks to the U.S. financial system. The study also identified efforts U.S. government agencies, regulators, and other market participants should explore to mitigate the laundering of illicit proceeds through this industry. Treasury’s Study of the Facilitation of Money Laundering and Terror Finance Through the Trade in Works of Art found that while there is some evidence of money laundering risk in the high-value art market, there was limited evidence of a nexus between terrorist financing risk and high-value art (which the study theorizes is in part due “to a disconnect between the high-value art market and the physical geographies where terrorist groups are most active”). Participants most vulnerable to money laundering in the art market, the study noted, are financial services companies that offer art-collateralized loans but that are not subject to comprehensive anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) requirements. Banks that facilitate payments between customers and art market institutions also present unique money laundering risks, the study found, while asset-based lending can disguise the original source of funds and provide liquidity to criminals. The study further cautioned that entities with large annual sales turnover present higher money laundering risks, and stressed that the emerging digital art market (including non-fungible tokens or NFTs) “may present new risks, depending on the structure and market incentives of certain activity in this sector of the market.”
To address the identified risks, the study recommended the following: (i) supporting “private sector information-sharing programs to encourage transparency among art market participants”; (ii) “updating guidance and training for law enforcement, customs enforcement, and asset recovery agencies”; (iii) using recordkeeping and reporting authorities to support information collection and money laundering activity analyses; and (iv) “applying comprehensive AML/CFT requirements to certain art market participants.” Treasury noted that it will consider “how these measures could mitigate identified money laundering risk, the potential burden on smaller art market participants, privacy considerations, as well as progress on addressing systemic AML/CFT issues, such as the abuse of shell companies.”
OFAC issues Ethiopia sanctions regulations and amendments for civil penalties
On February 8, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions regulations pursuant to Executive Order 14046 of September 17, 2021, “Imposing Sanctions on Certain Persons with Respect to the Humanitarian and Human Rights Crisis in Ethiopia.” According to the final rule, OFAC “intends to supplement these regulations with a more comprehensive set of regulations, which may include additional interpretive guidance and definitions, general licenses, and other regulatory provisions.” The regulations become effective February 9, upon publication in the Federal Register.
OFAC also announced that it is amending its regulations to implement the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, which adjusts for inflation the maximum amount of the civil monetary penalties that may be assessed under relevant OFAC regulations. The amendments become effective February 9, upon publication in the Federal Register.
Treasury stresses importance of regulating stablecoins
On February 8, Under Secretary for Domestic Finance Nellie Liang testified before the House Financial Services Committee that more must be done to clearly and consistently regulate stablecoins. Stablecoins’ “exponential growth” heightens “the urgency of ensuring that an appropriate regulatory framework is in place,” Liang stressed, adding that the value of stablecoins has grown over the last two years from roughly $5 billion in 2020 to approximately $175 billion today.
Liang encouraged lawmakers to consider two additional issues as they create policy: (i) regulations for “intermediaries” in the digital asset markets, including traditional financial actors such as banks and investment companies, as well as stablecoin issuers, custodial wallet providers, and digital asset exchanges; and (ii) potential systemic risk that may result from the build-up of leverage against digital assets, which “can play a key role in catalyzing and accelerating financial instability.” Liang compared the second issue to the 2007-2008 financial crisis. To address this risk, Liang stated that the Biden Administration is examining the role that leverage plays in the digital asset market, as well as the implications that leverage may have on the rest of the financial system. She also reiterated concerns raised in the President’s Working Group (PWG) on Financial Markets’ report on stablecoins (covered by InfoBytes here), which emphasized that stablecoins may be more widely used in the future as a means of payment and could increase “risks to users and the broader system.” Liang stressed that “[w]hile Treasury and the PWG fully support efforts by state and federal agencies to use existing authorities in support of their statutory mandates, we do not believe existing authorities provide a sufficient basis for comprehensive and consistent oversight of stablecoins.”
Treasury says banks need to collaborate to combat corruption
On February 3, U.S. Treasury Department Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes Elizabeth Rosenberg spoke before the Union of Arab Banks Conference to discuss the importance of working with member institutions in the Middle East and Africa to fight corruption. While noting that countering terrorist financing remains a crucial priority, Rosenberg pointed out that terrorist financing is not the only threat affecting the financial system. “In countries across the region, we have seen trends in which some politically exposed persons have sought to hide their ill-gotten gains through transfers to secondary jurisdictions under both themselves as well as family members’ and associates’ names,” Rosenberg said. “This is something that banks have a responsibility, indeed an obligation, to identify and halt,” she added, emphasizing that “[w]e will all be stronger, more secure, if every bank represented here builds and maintains strong compliance programs” designed to “identify and disrupt the onboarding of customers and the processing of transactions involv[ing] bribes or expropriated government funds.” Rosenberg encouraged the banks to share information on corruption with each other and to ensure enhanced due diligence, especially when dealing with politically exposed persons. “Nearly every act of corruption flows through the formal financial system, the system we are all a part of, which means all of us have the ability—and the responsibility—to stop it,” Rosenberg noted, highlighting the “global corruption boom” in recent decades resulting from individuals seeking to conceal assets and ownerships though shell companies or transactions involving art, real estate, and cryptocurrencies. Rosenberg also informed the banks that as part of the Biden Administration anti-corruption strategy, Treasury “will soon require many U.S. and foreign companies to report their true beneficial owners and to update that information when those beneficial owners change.”
FSOC reports on NBFIs
On February 4, the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) released a statement regarding nonbank financial intermediation. According to the statement, FSOC received updates on progress over the past year regarding three types of nonbank financial institutions (NBFIs), which include hedge funds, open-end funds, and money market funds (MMF). The statement noted that FSOC reestablished its Hedge Fund Working Group in 2021, with the primary objective of providing updates to FSOC’s “assessment of potential risks to U.S. financial stability from hedge funds, their activities, and their interconnections with other market participants.” FSOC “supports the Hedge Fund Working Group’s recommendation that the Office of Financial Research (OFR) consider ways to obtain better data on the uncleared bilateral repurchase agreement market, an important source of leverage for hedge funds.” In 2021, FSOC also established an interagency staff-level Open-end Fund Working Group, which assessed potential risks to U.S. financial stability arising from open-end funds. FSOC noted that it “supports the Open-end Fund Working Group’s continued analysis of the potential risks to financial stability that may arise from liquidity transformation at open-end funds.” In respect to MMF, FSOC noted that it supports the SEC’s efforts to reform MMFs and strengthen short-term funding markets.
OFAC sanctions Indonesian NGO
On February 3, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions pursuant to Executive Order 13224 against a non-governmental organization established by an Indonesia-based designated terrorist group for the purpose of providing financial support to extremists in Syria under the cover of humanitarian aid. According to Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, Brian E. Nelson, “[t]he United States is taking this action to expose and disrupt [the terrorist group’s] deceptive efforts to use a purported ‘humanitarian organization’ for illicit purposes as a front for collecting and transferring funds.” Nelson added that “Treasury will continue to work with foreign partners to protect the non-profit sector from abuse by terrorist groups that disguise illicit finance flows as humanitarian activity.” As a result of the sanctions, all property and interests in property of the sanctioned entity subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked and must be reported to OFAC. U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in any dealings involving the property or interests in property of blocked or designated persons, unless exempt or authorized by a general or specific OFAC license. OFAC further warned that the agency “can prohibit or impose strict conditions on the opening or maintaining in the United States of a correspondent account or a payable-through account of a foreign financial institution that knowingly conducted or facilitated any significant transaction on behalf of a Specially Designated Global Terrorist.”