InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
FHFA and HUD expand publicly-available appraisal data
On October 28, FHFA and HUD jointly, and for the first time, released new appraisal data from single-family mortgage loan applications submitted to HUD’s sector under the FHA. The update expanded the scope of the FHFA’s Uniform Appraisal Dataset to include FHA appraisal data, which previously only covered appraisals for loans acquired by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
As described by the agencies, the initiative supported the Interagency Task Force on Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity in addressing appraisal bias and promoting fairness in home valuations. The release also included quarterly aggregate statistics and online dashboards. The expanded dataset now encompasses nearly 9 million single-family home appraisals from 2017 through mid-2024.
HUD charges appraiser for alleged racial discrimination
On July 15, HUD released a charge of discrimination on behalf of a complainant against several respondents, including a mortgage lender and its agent (an appraisal management company), for allegedly discriminating against the complainant based on race and color in violation of the Fair Housing Act (FHA). The complainant, who is Black, first filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Division in April 2021, and HUD reactivated the complaint in June 2021, with the Colorado Civil Rights Division’s approval after investigating the case further.
The charge of discrimination stated that an independent home appraiser, contracted by the appraisal management company, valued the complainant’s property at $640,000. This amount was significantly lower than the appraisals the complainant received on her home both eight months prior – $860,000, and from 2018, $750,000 – despite the complainant making updates to the property and housing prices rising in her area. After speaking with the mortgage lender about the allegedly discriminatory valuations, the mortgage lender told the complainant that she could either proceed with her loan application using the appraised value or have the lender deny the loan application and refer her to the client relations department. The lender ultimately canceled the complainant’s loan application. At the same time, she pursued her discrimination claim, even though the complainant had told the lender that she did not want them to terminate her application.
HUD charged that all respondents violated sections 804(b) and 805 of the FHA by allegedly discriminating against the complainant on the basis of race or color (i) in connection with providing services with the sale of a dwelling, and (ii) in the terms or conditions of a residential real-estate related transaction. Further, HUD charged that the lender violated Section 805 of the FHA by discriminating by making available a residential real estate transaction due to race or color. HUD also charged the lender violated Section 818 of the FHA by allegedly interfering with the complainant by retaliating against her because she reported a discriminatory housing practice.
HUD asked the court to enjoin respondents from any future discriminatory actions based on race and color, mandate that respondents take all affirmative steps to remedy these effects, award full damages to the complainant, and assess a civil penalty against each respondent.
Director Thompson outlines FHFA’s efforts to promote housing access and affordability
On April 18, Sandra L. Thompson, Director of the FHFA, addressed the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, emphasizing FHFA’s role in promoting access to affordable housing for homebuyers and renters nationwide through the regulation and supervision of its regulated entities—Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Bank System—to ensure they meet their housing mission. Acknowledging the reforms implemented by FHFA over the past 15 years, which have strengthened the financial conditions of regulated entities, and FHFA’s ongoing review of the FHLBank System, Thompson outlined the agency’s efforts to address barriers to affordable and sustainable housing. Her recommendations include amending the Bank Act to expand the range of member institutions eligible to pledge community financial institution (CFI) collateral in order to secure affordable FHLBank advances to include all Community Development Financial Institutions and credit union members, and increasing the statutorily required minimum funding contribution for the Affordable Housing Program from 10 percent to at least 20 percent of FHLBank net income from the previous year. Thompson further highlighted FHFA’s efforts to address appraisal bias and improve data to promote equitable valuations, reduce costs associated with title verification, and codify the requirements that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac maintain Equitable Housing Finance Plans, among other initiatives. Thompson concluded her remarks by discussing FHFA’s ongoing credit score initiative, which seeks to transition Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s use of Classic FICO to the use of the more inclusive FICO 10T and VantageScore 4.0 models, alongside shifting from tri-merge to bi-merge credit reports.
Chopra pens comment letter on appraisal issues, including bias, related to not-for-profit player’s oversight
On March 18, the Director of the CFPB, Rohit Chopra, in his capacity as a voting member of the FFIEC, released a comment letter regarding the recent Appraisal Subcommittee hearings. He opened on how the appraisal process was governed not by a governmental agency, but instead by a not-for-profit corporation leading to “key issues” related to appraisal bias. Despite its private status, this organization was governed by the Appraisal Subcommittee which monitors and reviews the organizational structure of the not-for-profit appraisal corporation. Chopra outlined several issues gleaned from the four hearings: First, Chopra noted “severe deficiencies” with the not-for-profit’s conflict of interest policies, noting that the Executive Branch’s conflict of interest policies for employees spanned 77 pages, while the not-for-profit’s policy was less than 10. Second, the not-for-profit has an “insular and contorted governance structure” that favors private over public interests. And third, the Appraisal Foundation’s governance processes, such as electing its President, lack transparency. Chopra highlighted these three examples and described the overall lack of accountability as “deeply troubling” because the not-for-profit was one of the most powerful players when it comes to appraisals.
OCC’s Hsu discusses appraisal bias
On February 13, Acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael Hsu discussed eliminating appraisal bias in the financial industry at a public hearing held by the Appraisal Subcommittee of the FFIEC. In his remarks, Hsu highlighted the importance of addressing bias in the existing standards for appraisal reports to aid in the OCC’s efforts to expand access to homeownership. Hsu noted that the OCC is taking steps to increase access to homeownership by improving supervisory methods used to identify potential discrimination in lending and housing valuations and encouraging banks to expand affordable housing financing and access to credit.
Agencies finalize 2024 HPML smaller loan exemption threshold
On November 13, the CFPB, OCC, and the Fed published final amendments to the official interpretations for regulations implementing Section 129H of TILA, which establishes special appraisal requirements for “higher-risk mortgages,” otherwise termed as “higher-priced mortgage loans” (HPMLs). The final rule increases TILA’s loan exemption threshold for the special appraisal requirements for HPMLs. Each year, the threshold must be readjusted based on the annual percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers. The exemption threshold will increase from $31,000 to $32,400 effective January 1, 2024.
HUD and NAREB to educate consumers on appraisal bias
On August 2, HUD announced a partnership with the National Association of Real Estate Brokers to address appraisal bias and discrimination in the housing market. The collaboration, launching in October 2023, will include online training, roundtable discussions, and distribution of educational material designed to promote fairness in the housing market. HUD also referenced its involvement in the PAVE task force (covered by InfoBytes here), which is dedicated to ending bias in home valuation and has made critical progress since its launch in 2022.
Rhode Island enacts provisions for real estate appraisal
On June 20, the Rhode Island state governor signed SB 850 (the “Act”), which amends the Real Estate Appraiser Certification Act and the Real Estate Appraisal Management Company (AMC) Registration Act for consistency with federal laws and recommendations from the appraisal subcommittee. Among other things, the Act includes new terminology, including “covered transaction” and “state-licensed real estate appraiser.” This Act sets forth numerous additional provisions, one of which requires that appraisals must be performed by licensed or certified appraisers unless they are specifically exempt under federal law. Also amended are state-certified appraisers and state-licensed appraisers’ classifications. Specifically, the text defining residential property appraisal is replaced with a general statement that requirements for certification and licensing of appraisers will be “as required by the appraiser qualifications board of the appraisal foundation.” Another addition addresses the continuing education requirement for state-licensed and state-certified real estate appraisers, which now stipulates that up to one-half of an individual’s continuing education requirement may be completed by participation in certain educational activities approved by the board. Concerning registration, the Act contains a new subsection, detailing that AMCs cannot be registered in the state if any owner (an individual who owns more than 10 percent) of the AMC fails to submit to a background check or any owner is determined by the director to not have good moral character. Among other amendments, the Act also stipulates that registration is now valid for only one year (previously two years) after issuance.
The Act is effective upon passage.
Hsu says OCC focused on fairness in banking
On March 30, acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael J. Hsu commented that the safety and soundness of the federal banking system continues to be a top agency priority, as is improving fairness in banking. Speaking at a conference, Hsu discussed several measures taken by the OCC to elevate and advance fairness, particularly for the underserved and financially vulnerable. Explaining that OCC examiners are encouraging bank management to review existing overdraft protection programs and consider adopting pro-consumer reforms, Hsu referred to CFPB guidance issued last October to address unfair, deceptive, and abusive practices associated with “so-called ‘surprise overdraft’ fees.” (Covered by InfoBytes here.) He also commented that both the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have cited the risk of violating UDAP in connection with the certain overdraft practices. Hsu noted that not all overdraft practices are equal, stating that “authorize positive, settle negative” and “representment” fees both present heightened risks.
Recognizing the recent decline in banks’ reliance on overdraft fees, Hsu emphasized that most bankers he has spoken to “understand the importance of treating their customers fairly and have been open to learning about best practices.” He noted that “[t]hese bankers are committed to being there for their customers and providing them with short-term, small dollar liquidity when it is needed most. Many customers tell their banks, as well as groups that have studied overdraft practices, that this banking service helps them meet payments when they come due.” Hsu added that the OCC’s intended goal is to “improve the fairness of these programs by making them more pro-consumer, not to eliminate them,” and that “[m]ore fairness means more financially healthy communities, which means more trust in banking.” Hsu also discussed efforts taken by the OCC to combat discriminatory lending practices, including working to enhance supervisory methods for identifying appraisal discrimination.
Oregon clarifies appraisal company registration authority
On March 13, the Oregon governor signed HB 2287 to clarify that the Appraiser Certification and Licensure Board (the “Board”) is the entity responsible for determining specified criteria for registration or certification of real estate appraisal management companies. In Oregon, “[a] person may not directly or indirectly engage in or attempt to engage in business as an appraisal management company or advertise or represent that the entity is an appraisal management company unless the person is” registered with the Board or is owned and controlled by an insured depository institution. The Act takes effect 91 days following adjournment of the legislature.