InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
Agencies flag intermediaries in evading Russia-related sanctions
On March 2, the DOJ, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), and the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued a joint compliance note on the use of third-party intermediaries or transshipment points to evade Russian- and Belarussian-related sanctions and export controls. This is the first collective effort taken by the three agencies to inform the international community, the private sector, and the public about efforts taken by malign actors to evade sanctions and export controls in order to provide support for Russia’s war against Ukraine. The compliance note outlines enforcement trends and details attempts made by Russia “to circumvent restrictions, disguise the involvement of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons [] or parties on the Entity List in transactions, and obscure the true identities of Russian end users.” The compliance note also provides common red flags indicating whether a third-party intermediary may be engaged in efforts to evade sanctions or export controls, and outlines guidance for companies on maintaining effective, risk-based sanctions and export compliance programs. The agencies highlight other measures taken to constrain Russia, including stringent export controls imposed by BIS to restrict Russia’s access to technologies and other items, sanctions and civil money penalties issued against U.S. persons who violate OFAC sanctions and non-U.S. persons who cause U.S. persons to violate Russian sanctions programs, and the DOJ’s interagency law enforcement task force, Task Force KleptoCapture, which enforces sanctions, export controls, and economic countermeasures imposed by the U.S. and foreign allies and partners.
OFAC settles with Indian tobacco company on North Korean transactions
On March 1, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a $332,500 settlement with an India-registered tobacco company to resolve allegations that it “requested payment in U.S. dollars for its indirect exportation of tobacco to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea [(DPRK)].” According to OFAC’s web notice, in late 2016, an assistant manager at the company and a representative from a Thai intermediary began communicating about a prospective order of tobacco from a DPRK customer. A decision was eventually made not to include the DPRK customer or to list the DPRK in trade documents for the order. Rather, the order listed the Thai intermediary as the customer and China as the destination. OFAC maintained that the company issued three invoices to the Thai intermediary for its tobacco orders, and asked that payments be sent in USD to either the company’s bank account at a non-U.S. bank in India or to the India-branch of a U.S. bank. Between July and August 2017, four Hong Kong-organized intermediaries remitted funds to the company for these shipments and made five payments totaling approximately $369,228. Four of the five USD payments were sent to the non-U.S. bank, causing three U.S. financial institutions to clear the payments. The fifth payment was sent to the India-branch of a U.S. bank. By directing the Hong Kong intermediaries to remit payments in USD, OFAC claimed the company “caused U.S. correspondent banks that processed the payments, as well as the foreign branch of a U.S. bank, to export financial services to or otherwise facilitate the exportation of tobacco to the DPRK” in violation of the North Korea Sanctions Regulations.
In arriving at the settlement amount, OFAC determined, among other things, that several managers had actual knowledge of the alleged conduct at issue, and that the company “acted recklessly” by “fail[ing] to exercise a minimal degree of caution or care for U.S. sanctions laws and regulations and caus[ing] U.S. financial institutions to export financial services or otherwise facilitate the exportation of tobacco to the DPRK.”
OFAC also considered various mitigating factors, including that the company has not received a penalty notice from OFAC in the preceding five years. Additionally, the company undertook remedial measures upon learning of the alleged violations, cooperated with OFAC throughout the investigation, and agreed to toll the statute of limitations, the notice said.
Providing context for the settlement, OFAC said that this action “highlights the deceptive practices DPRK entities use to evade U.S. and international sanctions and acquire revenue-generating goods, such as by employing intermediaries in various countries to coordinate shipping and make payments.”
OFAC sanctions timeshare fraud network
On March 2, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions, pursuant to Executive Order 14059, against eight Mexican companies connected to timeshare fraud on behalf of the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG). The CJNG is also designated under E.O. 14059. OFAC described timeshare fraud typology, explaining that schemes often involve third-party scammers who claim to have ready buyers and make unsolicited purchase offers to timeshare owners. If these offers are accepted, the scammers ask timeshare owners to pay advance fees and taxes to “facilitate or expedite the sale with assurances of reimbursement upon closing.” However, timeshare owners, after making multiple payments, eventually realize that the offers do not exist and lose their money, OFAC said. In conjunction with the sanctions, OFAC issued an alert warning that perpetrators of timeshare fraud may falsely claim to represent OFAC to appear legitimate and further their fraud.
As a result of the sanctions, all property and interests in property of the designated persons located in the U.S. or held by U.S. persons is blocked and must be reported to OFAC. Further, “any entities that are owned, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons are also blocked.” U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in any dealings involving the property or interests in property of blocked or designated persons unless authorized by an OFAC-issued general or specific license, or exempt. OFAC further warned that “U.S. persons may face civil or criminal penalties for violations of E.O. 14059 and the Kingpin Act.”
Treasury seeks to advance CBDCs
On March 1, Treasury Undersecretary for Domestic Finance Nellie Liang announced that the Treasury Department will lead a new senior-level working group to advance work on a U.S. central bank digital currency (CBDC). As previously discussed in a Treasury report released last September on the future of money and payments (covered by InfoBytes here), Treasury was called to lead an interagency working group to complement work undertaken by the Federal Reserve Board to consider the implications of a U.S. CBDC. The working group will consist of leaders from Treasury, the Fed, and White House offices, including the Council of Economic Advisors, National Economic Council, National Security Council, and Office of Science and Technology Policy. In the coming months the working group “will begin to meet regularly to discuss a possible CBDC and other payments innovations,” Liang said during a workshop titled “Next Steps to the Future of Money and Payments.” The working group will focus on three main policy objectives: (i) how a U.S. CBDC would affect U.S. global financial leadership; (ii) potential national security risks posed by a CBDC; and (iii) the implications for privacy, illicit finance, and financial inclusion if a CBDC is created.
To support discussions on a possible CBDC and other payment innovations, Liang said the working group will develop an initial set of findings and recommendations. Those findings and recommendations may relate to whether a U.S. CBDC would help advance certain policy objectives, what features would be required for a U.S. CBDC to advance these objectives, choices for resolving CBDC design trade-offs, and areas where additional technological research and development might be useful.
Liang commented that the working group will also “engage with allies and partners to promote shared learning and responsible development of CBDCs.” She pointed out that CBDC efforts are already underway in jurisdictions around the world, with 11 countries already having fully launched CBDCs, “while central banks in other major jurisdictions are researching and experimenting with CBDCs, with some at a fairly advanced stage.” Liang stressed that regardless of whether a CBDC is adopted in the U.S., the country “has an interest in ensuring that CBDCs interact safely and efficiently with the existing financial infrastructure; that they support financial stability and the integrity of the international financial system; that global payment systems are efficient, innovative, competitive, secure, and resilient; and that global payments systems continue to reflect broader shared democratic values, like openness, privacy, accessibility, and accountability to the communities that rely upon them.”
Biden administration releases National Cybersecurity Strategy
On March 2, the Biden administration announced the release of its National Cybersecurity Strategy (Strategy) in a continued effort to provide a safe and secure digital ecosystem for Americans. The Strategy, which expands on other steps taken by the administration in this space (covered by InfoBytes here), focuses on several key pillars for building and enhancing collaboration, including:
- Defending critical infrastructure. The Strategy will expand the use of minimum cybersecurity requirements in critical sectors, harmonize regulations to reduce compliance burdens, ensure public-private collaboration is able to defend critical infrastructure and essential services, and defend and modernize federal networks and incident response policies.
- Disrupting and dismantling threat actors. Under the Strategy, tools will be strategically employed to disrupt adversaries, and the private sector will be used to disrupt activities. Ransomware threats will also be addressed through a comprehensive federal approach “in lockstep” with international partners.
- Shaping market forces to drive security and resilience. In an effort “to reduce risk and shift the consequences of poor cybersecurity away from the most vulnerable,” the Strategy proposes to (i) promote privacy and security of personal data; (ii) “[shift] liability for software products and services to promote secure development practices”; and (iii) ensure investments in new infrastructure are supported by federal grant programs.
- Investing in a resilient future. The Strategy promotes coordinated, collaborative actions for reducing systemic technical vulnerabilities across the digital ecosystem and improving resiliency against transnational digital repression. The Strategy also prioritizes cybersecurity research and development for emerging technologies, including postquantum encryption, digital identity solutions, and clean energy infrastructure, and stresses the importance of developing a diverse, robust national cyber workforce.
- Forging international partnerships to pursue shared goals. The Strategy intends to leverage international coalitions and partnerships to counter threats to the digital ecosystem through the use of joint preparedness, response, and cost imposition, which will enable partners to better defend themselves against cyber threats. The U.S. will also work with international partners to create secure, reliable global information and communications technology supply chains and operational technology products and services.
While “next-generation technologies are reaching maturity at an accelerating pace, creating new pathways for innovation while increasing digital interdependencies,” the announcement warned that state and non-state actors are developing and executing campaigns that threaten the digital ecosystem. The Biden administration’s Strategy aims to address those threats.
OFAC issues supplemental guidance on humanitarian sanctions exceptions
On February 27, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued supplemental guidance for the provision of humanitarian assistance. As previously covered by InfoBytes, last December OFAC implemented a carveout from the asset freeze provisions of UN sanctions programs by issuing or amending several general licenses to ease the delivery of humanitarian aid and ensure a baseline of authorizations for the provision of humanitarian support across many sanctions programs. The 2023 fact sheet provides information for the U.S. government, international organizations and entities, nongovernmental organizations, persons involved in the distribution of food, agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices, and financial institutions and other service providers who support or facilitate these transactions. The action reflects “Treasury’s work to limit the unintended impact of sanctions by providing greater consistency and clarity across U.S. sanctions programs to help legitimate humanitarian assistance and related trade reach at-risk populations through transparent financial channels.”
OFAC sanctions Mexican arms trafficker for supplying weapons to cartel
On February 28, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14059 against a Mexican national for his role in providing, or having attempted to provide, financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services in support of, the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG). The CJNG is also designated under E.O. 14059. According to OFAC, the sanctions are part of a whole-of-government effort to combat global threats posed by illicit drug trafficking into the U.S. The agency stressed it will continue to coordinate with federal government partners and foreign counterparts to target and pursue accountability for foreign illicit drug actors. As a result of the sanctions, the designated individual’s property located in the U.S. or held by U.S. persons is blocked and must be reported to OFAC. Further, “any entities that are owned, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons are also blocked.” U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in any dealings involving the property or interests in property of blocked or designated persons unless authorized by an OFAC-issued general or specific license, or exempt. OFAC further warned that “U.S. persons may face civil or criminal penalties for violations of E.O. 14059 and the Kingpin Act.”
OFAC sanctions persons supporting North Korea
On March 1, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions against three entities and two individuals for their roles in illicitly generating revenue to support the government of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). According to OFAC, two of the sanctioned entities are designated pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13687 “for being agencies, instrumentalities, or controlled entities of the Government of North Korea or the Workers’ Party of Korea.” One of the entities is a subordinate to the Government of North Korea, and is used by the DPRK government to earn foreign currency, collect intelligence, and provide cover status for intelligence operatives. The other entity—a subordinate to the DPRK Ministry of People’s Armed Forces (which was previously sanctioned by OFAC)—allegedly generated funds for the DPRK government for decades by conducting art and construction projects on behalf of regimes throughout the Middle East and Africa. The two individuals are sanctioned, pursuant to E.O. 13810, for being North Korean persons who have generated revenue for the DPRK government or the Workers’ Party of Korea. These individuals, OFAC said, established the third sanctioned entity in the Democratic Republic of the Congo to earn revenue from construction and statue-building projects with local governments.
As a result of the sanctions, all property and interests in property of the sanctioned persons that are in the United States or in the possession or control of U.S. persons must be blocked and reported to OFAC, as well as “any entities that are owned, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons.” Persons that engage in certain transactions with the designated individuals and entities may themselves be exposed to sanctions, and “any foreign financial institution that knowingly facilitates a significant transaction or provides significant financial services for any of the individuals or entities designated today could be subject to U.S. correspondent or payable-through account sanctions.”
FinCEN warns financial institutions of surge in mail theft-related check fraud
On February 27, FinCEN issued an alert to financial institutions on the nationwide surge in check fraud schemes targeting the U.S. mail. Mail theft-related check fraud, FinCEN explained, generally relates to the fraudulent negotiation of checks stolen from the U.S. postal service, and represents one of the most significant money laundering threats to the U.S. The alert is intended to ensure financial institutions file suspicious activity reports (SARs) that appropriately identify and report suspected check fraud schemes possibly linked to mail theft. The alert highlighted red flags to help financial institutions identify and report suspicious activity, and reminded financial institutions of their Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) reporting requirements. According to FinCEN, BSA reporting for check fraud has increased significantly over the past three years. “In 2021, financial institutions filed over 350,000 [SARs] to FinCEN to report potential check fraud, a 23 percent increase over the number of check fraud-related SARs filed in 2020,” the agency said, adding that in 2022, SARs related to check fraud reached over 680,000. When suspecting this type of fraud, financial institutions are advised to refer customers to the United States Postal Inspection Service in addition to filing a SAR.
OFAC issues more Russian sanctions and metals and mining determination
On February 24, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced significant measures targeting the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy under Executive Order 14024. OFAC also imposed sanctions on 22 individuals and 83 entities to further isolate Russia from the international economy and hinder the country’s access to capital, materials, technology, and military support sustaining its war against Ukraine. (See also OFAC’s fact sheet on sanctions measures taken during the past year.) According to OFAC, the designations target “over 30 third-country individuals and companies connected to Russia’s sanctions evasion efforts, including those related to arms trafficking and illicit finance.” The agency added that “[w]hile Russian banks representing over 80 percent of total Russian banking sector assets are already subject to U.S and international sanctions,” it is now “designating over a dozen financial institutions in Russia, including one of the top-ten largest banks by asset value.” OFAC explained that sanctioned actors are known to turn to smaller banks and wealth-management firms to evade sanctions and access the international financial system. As a result, several wealth management-related entities and associated individuals playing key roles in Russia’s financial services sector have been sanctioned. OFAC also issued a determination (effective February 24), in consultation with the Department of State, allowing for sanctions to be imposed on any individual or entity determined to operate or have operated in the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy.
As a result of the sanctions, all property and interests in property belonging to the sanctioned persons that are in the U.S. or in the possession or control of U.S. persons are blocked and must be reported to OFAC. Further, “any entities that are owned, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons are also blocked.” U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in any dealings involving the property or interests in property of blocked or designated persons unless authorized by an OFAC-issued general or specific license, or exempt.
The announcement further noted that additional measures have been taken by the Departments of State and Commerce, as well as the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, in coordination with allies and G7 partners.
In conjunction with the sanctions, OFAC issued several Russia-related general licenses (see GLs 8F, 13D, 60, and 61), as well as five associated frequently asked questions.