InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
OFAC advises risk-based compliance approach during Covid-19 crisis
On April 20, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued a statement reminding businesses—including financial institutions—to adhere to a risk-based administration of their sanctions compliance plans. The release notes that, in light of Covid-19, businesses may need to reassign resources otherwise dedicated to sanctions compliance to other areas. If apparent violations are made due to this reallocation of resources, OFAC asserts that it will take this into consideration when determining the appropriate response to the business. Also, businesses and persons subject to OFAC regulatory authority are urged to contact OFAC if the businesses anticipate any delays in satisfying deadlines or in filing required submissions and reports, including meeting the 10-day deadline for filing reject reports. The statement provides OFAC contact information appropriate to a number of situations, including matters related to reject reports, subpoenas, license reports, requests for reconsideration, and self-disclosures.
Debt collection trade association claims Massachusetts emergency regulation is unconstitutional
On April 20, a debt collection trade association filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts against the Massachusetts attorney general, challenging the state’s emergency regulation issued in March, which makes numerous standard debt collection actions an unfair and deceptive act or practice during the Covid-19 pandemic. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the emergency regulation includes provisions that prohibit both creditors and debt collectors from (i) initiating, filing, or threatening to file debt collection lawsuits; (ii) garnishing wages and repossessing vehicles; and (iii) initiating phone calls with debtors, unless necessary to discuss a rescheduled court appearance or at the request of the debtor. Alleging violations of both state and federal law, including the First Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, and the separation of powers, the trade association argues that the emergency regulations are a content-based restriction on free speech and unconstitutional because they, among other things, exclude six classes of collectors from the prohibition on placing collection calls, and do not treat all “communications” equally by excluding certain types of collections communications. The trade association also contends that the restrictions block members from providing consumers with possible resolutions, such as “temporary hardship repayment plans that may provide a variety of options for deferring payments or determining longer-term payment plans tailored to individual consumer situations where income has been interrupted for any reason.” The complaint also cites examples from debt collectors in the state that detail the negative impact the emergency regulation has had on their businesses. The trade association filed an emergency motion seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction enjoining enforcement of the regulation.
Maryland commissioner of Financial Regulation issues advisory on lending limits for banks and credit unions
On April 17, the Maryland commissioner of Financial Regulation issued an advisory to address the legal lending limits for Maryland-chartered commercial banks and credit unions. The advisory provides that banks must follow either the Maryland lending limit or the federal lending limit; not both. Banks that are considering relief from the Maryland lending limit must comply with certain requirements. The commissioner also found that, in order to maintain parity with national banks, exemptions to the federal lending limit would be in the public interest and consistent with 12 U.S.C. § 84. Similarly, the governor authorized the commissioner to suspend certain requirements to allow a credit union to engage in transactions exceeding the total credit union limit provided certain requirements are satisfied.
Oregon governor exempts CARES Act payments from garnishment
On April 17, the governor of Oregon issued an executive order exempting all CARES Act stimulus payments to individuals from garnishment, subject to limited exceptions. CARES Act payments will remain exempt from garnishment when deposited into a financial institution. The exemption will remain in effect until terminated by the governor.
Florida expands motor vehicle retail installment initial payment rule
On April 17, the commissioner of the Florida Office of Financial Regulation issued Emergency Order 2020-03, which temporarily expands the motor vehicle retail installment initial pay rule. The order permits a motor vehicle retail installment seller licensed under Chapter 520 of the Florida Statues to allow the first payment of a motor vehicle retail installment contract to be scheduled up to 90 days from the date of the loan.
Alaska Department of Commerce issues special notice regarding premium finance company contracts
The Alaska Department of Commerce, Division of Banking and Securities (Division), issued a special notice responding to inquiries about premium finance companies’ contracts with a power of attorney to cancel all policies upon default. The division notes that while it does not have the authority over the contract or legal agreement, it encourages premium finance companies to review applicable guidance and recent bills passed by federal and state governments related to the Covid-19 crisis pertaining to late payments.
NCUA announces Covid-19 relief measures for credit unions
On April 17, the NCUA released a letter to federally insured credit unions to address temporary relief available as a result of Covid-19. The letter covers a number of matters discussed at the NCUA board’s open meeting held on April 16, including an interim final rule (IFR) issued on April 13 (covered by InfoBytes here) that permits credit unions to access the NCUA’s Central Liquidity Facility with no waiting period for advances. The letter also provides details on two real estate appraisal rules approved by the Board to provide regulatory relief for credit unions: (i) an IFR “that temporarily defers real estate-related appraisals and evaluations” for up to 120 days; and (ii) a final rule that increases the threshold amount for which a transaction involving real estate requires an appraisal from $250,000 to $400,000. Both the IFR and the final rule take effect upon publication in the Federal Register and expire on December 31. In addition, the board approved a final rule which (i) increases the maximum aggregate amount of loans a credit union can purchase from one lender without a waiver to “the greater of $5 million or 200 percent of a federally insured credit union’s net worth”; (ii) temporarily suspends the limit “on the eligible obligations that a federal credit union may purchase and hold”; and (iii) also suspends “the required timeframes for the occupancy or disposal of properties not being used to conduct business or that have been abandoned.”
Fed issues rule to temporarily allow bank insiders access to PPP
On April 17, the Federal Reserve Board (Fed) announced an interim final rule to allow “certain bank directors and shareholders” to apply for loans from the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). The rule will temporarily suspend some of the requirements of Federal Reserve Act Section 22(h) and Regulation O, to permit banks to extend credit to bank insiders, but only for PPP loans. This announcement comes after the SBA recently issued its own interim final rule regarding eligibility of directors and shareholders to apply for PPP loans for their own small businesses. The Fed’s interim final rule is effective upon publication in the Federal Register and comments must be received within 45 days of publication.
FTC seeks injunction against company posing as SBA lender
On April 17, the FTC filed a complaint against a Rhode Island-based company and its owner (defendants) for allegedly violating the FTC Act by claiming to be an approved lender for the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) even though the defendants are neither affiliated with the SBA nor are they an SBA-authorized lender. The FTC alleges in its complaint that the defendants made deceptive statements on their websites, such as “WE ARE A DIRECT LENDER FOR THE PPP PROGRAM,” and directly contacted small businesses claiming to be representing the SBA in order to solicit loan applications on behalf of the businesses’ banks. The FTC states that the defendants have received hundreds, if not thousands, of loan applications from businesses and continue to claim they can make PPP loans despite receiving a cease-and-desist letter earlier this month from the SBA. The FTC seeks injunctive relief to prevent the defendants from continuing to engage in the unlawful acts and practices, as well as “rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the refund of monies paid, disgorgement of ill-gotten monies, and other equitable relief” that the court deems necessary to redress any consumer harm, and an award of the costs for bringing the action.
New York Department of Financial Services announces temporary guidelines on annual meeting requirements
On April 16, New York Department of Financial Services announced temporary regulatory relief for state-chartered financial services entities regarding annual meeting requirements. The announcement specifically allowed for annual meetings to be conducted virtually via teleconference, and extended the deadline to hold stockholder meetings, allowing affected entities to fulfill the requirement within the first seven months, as opposed to the first four months, of its fiscal year.