InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
Senate Banking Committee Democrats urge Fed to expand settlement hours
On September 11, Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, sent a letter urging the Fed to adopt a proposed policy change to expand the operating days of the Fedwire Funds Service and National Settlement Service to include weekends and holidays. Brown states that the expansion aims to provide consumers with faster access to their money, reduce costs associated with overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees, and improve cash flow for small businesses. Additionally, Brown encouraged the Fed to explore extending settlement services to operate 24/7 while regularly assessing potential operational risks and continue developing a risk-management framework to protect wire transfer customers from fraud.
Senate Banking Committee pens support on CFPB’s proposed BNPL supervision
On September 10, Senators Jack Reed (D-RI), Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) penned a letter expressing their support for a new interpretive rule by the CFPB classifying “Buy Now, Pay Later” (BNPL) providers as credit card issuers. As previously covered by InfoBytes, on May 22, the CFPB issued an interpretive rule stating that certain consumer protection provisions of Regulation Z apply to BNPL accounts, asserting that “digital user accounts” used to access BNPL credit are considered “credit cards” under Regulation Z. In their letter, the senators characterized the rule as an “important step toward clarifying the regulatory status of BNPL loans.”
In the letter, the senators reported 43 percent of BNPL users were behind on payments and 28 percent delinquent on other debts, which they concluded shows that BNPL users are at greater risk of financial distress compared to credit card holders. They argued that the new rule would help protect consumers by requiring BNPL providers establish uniform methods for calculating the cost of credit, provide meaningful disclosure of those costs to consumers, provide standardized mechanisms for resolving credit billing disputes, and provide periodic statements. The senators also called for the CFPB to initiate separate rulemaking to bring the largest BNPL providers under federal supervision. Finally, to better assess whether BNPL users face elevated levels of defaults or delinquencies, the letter urged the CFPB to publish current data on the state of the BNPL market and to update this information annually.
Senate Banking Committee pens support on CFPB’s proposed BNPL supervision
On September 10, Senators Jack Reed (D-RI), Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) penned a letter expressing their support for a new interpretive rule by the CFPB classifying “Buy Now, Pay Later” (BNPL) providers as credit card issuers. As previously covered by InfoBytes, on May 22, the CFPB issued an interpretive rule stating that certain consumer protection provisions of Regulation Z apply to BNPL accounts, asserting that “digital user accounts” used to access BNPL credit are considered “credit cards” under Regulation Z. In their letter, the senators characterized the rule as an “important step toward clarifying the regulatory status of BNPL loans.”
In the letter, the senators reported 43 percent of BNPL users were behind on payments and 28 percent delinquent on other debts, which they concluded shows that BNPL users are at greater risk of financial distress compared to credit card holders. They argued that the new rule would help protect consumers by requiring BNPL providers establish uniform methods for calculating the cost of credit, provide meaningful disclosure of those costs to consumers, provide standardized mechanisms for resolving credit billing disputes, and provide periodic statements. The senators also called for the CFPB to initiate separate rulemaking to bring the largest BNPL providers under federal supervision. Finally, to better assess whether BNPL users face elevated levels of defaults or delinquencies, the letter urged the CFPB to publish current data on the state of the BNPL market and to update this information annually.
GOP Senators express concern on FDIC proposed rules regarding corporate governance and risk management
On July 31, Republican members of the U.S. Senate penned a letter to the Chairman of the FDIC, Martin Gruenberg, to convince the Chairman that an FDIC proposed rule regarding soundness standards for corporate governance and risk management may “hinder, not improve, safety and soundness in the U.S. financial system.” As previously covered by InfoBytes, the FDIC last sought comment on its NPRM titled “Guidelines Establishing Standards for Corporate Governance and Risk Management for Covered Institutions with Total Consolidated Assets of $10 Billion or More” in October 2023, which, among other things, would expand the responsibilities of the board of directors for financial institutions.
The Senators expressed three principal concerns about the proposed rules: first, that the proposed rules would impose new responsibilities on a financial institution’s board of directors that may be better suited to senior management, effectively “blur[ring] the lines between the responsibilities of senior management and responsibilities of the [b]oard,” particularly in respect of risk management processes; second, consistent with the criticisms by state supervisors, that some of the rules may conflict with other state and federal regulatory requirements, such as the preference that “risk management functions reside with the firm’s chief risk officer”; and third, the proposed rules would impose “burdensome” corporate governance standards to the smallest banks without any “empirical evidence” that any “discernible benefit” would be obtained. To confirm their findings, the Senators argued that the OCC removed requirements that were found to be analogous from a prior rulemaking — yet the FDIC has not.
The GOP Senators requested answers to several questions no later than August 16, such as whether the FDIC plans to amend or withdraw the proposed rules, and what level of engagement the FDIC had with state-based regulators or stakeholders in developing the proposal. The Senators also directed a question to the OCC’s Acting Comptroller regarding whether the OCC still “believes that board or risk committee approval of material policies under the Framework would be burdensome, and that these policies should be approved by management instead.” The Senators requested the FDIC withdraw the NPRM entirely.
Chopra testifies at House, Senate committee hearings
On June 12, the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs held a hearing to address the CFPB’s Semi-Annual Report to Congress. The CFPB Director, Rohit Chopra, in his opening statement addressed the Committee to report on the agency's recent activities and initiatives including its efforts in financial data privacy, open banking rules, and the protection of financial data from surveillance and misuse. Additionally, Chopra highlighted the CFPB’s work in the credit card market, having issued rules seeking to reduce certain credit card fees, foster competition, and protect consumers’ points and rewards. Chopra expressed a willingness to collaborate with the Committee to further address the country’s financial challenges.
Ranking Member Tim Scott (R-SC) warned that the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on the constitutionality of the CFPB’s funding structure was “not a green light for your progressive wish list.” Ranking Member Scott also questioned the CFPB’s issuance of civil investigative demands (CIDs), providing an example of a lengthy multi-year audit that resulted in no CFPB action. Additionally, Senator Reed (D-RI) raised concerns about the Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) market, noting that unlike credit card companies, BNPL firms do not consistently report consumer repayments to credit bureaus. He noted that the situation could lead to issues where consumers do not receive credit score benefits for responsible credit usage and where the industry lacks visibility into a consumer's total debt burden. Director Chopra acknowledged Reed’s concerns, citing that auto and mortgage lenders are worried about the lack of BNPL data in credit reports, which could affect their ability to assess borrowers' creditworthiness. Chopra suggested that while reporting is not currently mandated by federal law, it was an area of concern for the CFPB. Additionally, Senator Lummis (R-WY) highlighted “junk fees” and how the concept is being applied in the mortgage industry. Lummis mentioned a working paper by CFPB staff that credited consumer education provided by banks for a particular finding regarding rural borrowers’ understanding of the mortgage process. She followed by asking Chopra if the Bureau considered consumer education a valuable service provided by community banks because, according to Lummis, the cost to educate consumers was being labeled as a “junk fee” by the administration. Chopra’s response noted that there was no attempt to label all mortgage closing costs as “junk fees.” Senator Kennedy (R-LA) expressed confusion regarding the funding of the CFPB, referencing a distinction between revenue and earnings. He cited the statute that governs the CFPB's funding, which stated the agency received its funds from the combined earnings of the Fed. Kennedy pointed out that since September 2022, the Fed had been losing money and therefore had no earnings to transfer, questioning how the CFPB was entitled to any funds under these circumstances. Director Chopra acknowledged the concern and suggested that it was a theory the CFPB has previously explored.
The following day, the House Financial Services Committee also held a hearing to address the CFPB’s Semi-Annual Report. Representative McHenry (R-NC) reflected on the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the funding structure of the CFPB as established by the Dodd-Frank Act. He interpreted the court's opinion as affirming Congress's authority over funding mechanisms and suggested that Democrats join Republicans in creating legislative plans to make the CFPB more accountable. McHenry criticized Director Chopra's leadership, claiming the CFPB under Chopra had become politicized and was neglecting consumer protection in favor of political objectives. He also accused the CFPB of unfairly characterizing financial institutions and questioned Chopra's involvement in the FDIC's internal issues, referencing a toxic workplace culture and leadership problems. On the other hand, Representative Waters (D-CA) highlighted that the CFPB was “combating excessive and illegal junk fees, fighting against housing discrimination and redlining, and holding mega-banks accountable for breaking the law and harming consumers.”
Addressing the Bureau’s proposed rule under Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which governed consumer access to financial records, McHenry expressed concerns that the CFPB's proposed regulations might “entrench” those in the financial industry by valuing their hold on financial data. Director Chopra responded by emphasizing the need to prevent practices like bait-and-switch, where financial products such as auto loans are offered with the ulterior motive of “harvesting” and selling data. When McHenry asked for a timeline, Chopra indicated the aim to finalize the rule by October.
Among questions from other representatives, Representative Wagner (R-MO) questioned Director Chopra about the principles of risk-based pricing in the financial industry. Chopra stated that while it was not mandated, risk-based pricing was commonly used by institutions to appropriately measure risk. Wagner expressed concerns that the CFPB's new rules on credit card late fees and overdrafts could undermine this principle. Chopra disagreed, arguing that the rules would encourage better risk-based pricing, and he did not see a connection between aligning late fees with Congressional guidelines and undermining risk-based pricing. Wagner then suggested the new rules could increase persistent debt among consumers. Throughout the discussion, Chopra insisted that the CFPB's actions were in line with common sense and Congressional prohibitions against unreasonable fees.
Senators release roadmap for federal AI policy
On May 15, the Bipartisan Senate AI Working Group – comprising Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY), Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD), Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM) and Sen. Todd Young (R-IN) – released the Bipartisan Roadmap For Artificial Intelligence Policy. The roadmap included their findings and outlined key policy priorities for bipartisan consideration in the 118th Congress and beyond. Understanding that artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies would not fall into the jurisdiction of a single committee, and recognizing the need to manage AI's benefits and risks actively, the working group hosted nine AI Insight Forums to increase the Senate’s knowledge of AI-related policies. The Working Group hoped Senate committees would continue to seek outside input from a variety of stakeholders and experts to inform their decision making. The Working Group also encouraged the executive branch to share with Congress “updates on administration activities related to AI, including any AI-related [MOUs] with other countries and the results from any AI-related studies to better inform the legislative process.”
Key policy areas of the Senate’s AI roadmap included:
- Developing a comprehensive federal data privacy framework.
- Addressing potential long-term risks associated with AI.
- Boosting AI innovation funding to secure U.S. leadership and global competitiveness.
- Enforcing AI-related laws, addressing potential biases, and enhancing AI transparency and “explainability.”
- Preparing the workforce for AI-induced changes, including job displacement and retraining.
- Strengthening national security through adopting AI technology and managing related threats.
- Addressing the issue of deepfakes in elections and protecting content creators and journalists.
- Promoting competition in AI among higher education and businesses, supported by federal funding for the National AI Research Resource.