InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
FTC, state AGs order says retailer used illegal tactics on servicemembers
On July 20, the FTC and 18 state attorneys general announced a proposed order against a national jewelry retailer (defendant) for allegedly using illegal financing and sales practices on service members and their families. In the complaint, the FTC alleged that the defendants violated the TILA, Holder Rule, and EFTA, among other things, by: (i) making false or unsubstantiated claims that financing jewelry purchases through the company would result in higher credit scores; (ii) misrepresenting that the protection plan was required to finance purchases; and (iii) failing to provide clear written disclosures and meet authorization requirements for contracts. The complaint also alleged that the defendant violated the Military Lending Act (MLA), the FTC’s first action under this Act, because, by failing to “provide disclosures in accord with TILA, including the Itemization of the Amount Financed, they also do not provide all disclosures required by the MLA.” The proposed order requires that the defendants are, among other things: (i) prohibited from making misrepresentations; (ii) prohibited from making unsubstantiated claims; (ii) banned from the marketing or sale of ancillary products or services; and (iii) banned from transferring retail installment contracts to third parties. The order also requires the defendant to refund approximately $10.9 million for purchased protection plans, and provide refunds for overpayments.
Creditors release statement on Ukraine
On July 20, the Group of Creditors of Ukraine issued a joint statement regarding coordinated suspension of debt services for Ukraine through 2023, as the Russian invasion continues. According to the statement, the group noted that it would also consider the possibility of deferral for an additional year beyond 2023. The statement granted Ukraine’s request for deferral given the “exceptional circumstances, and acknowledging Ukraine’s exemplary track record of honoring debt service to date,” also “strongly encourage[s] all other official bilateral creditors to swiftly reach agreement with Ukraine on a debt service suspension.”
DOJ announces settlement with ride sharing company over ADA violations
On July 18, the DOJ announced a settlement in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to resolve a lawsuit alleging that a ride sharing service (defendant) violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). According to the complaint, in April 2016, the defendant started charging passengers wait time fees, which charged wait time fees starting two minutes after the defendant’s vehicle arrives at the pickup location, and the fees are charged until the vehicle starts its trip. The DOJ claimed that the defendant violated the ADA by failing to: (i) “ensure adequate vehicle boarding time for passengers with disabilities”; (ii) “ensure equitable fares for passengers with disabilities”; and (iii) “make reasonable modifications to its policies and practices of imposing wait time fees as applied to passengers who, because of disability, require more time to board the vehicle.” According to the settlement agreement, the defendant – who denies any wrongdoing, liability, or fault – must, among other things: (i) pay $1.7 million to more than 1,000 riders who have already complained to the company about being charged wait time fees as a result of a disability; (ii) pay $500,000 to “other harmed individuals identified by the department”; and (iii) pay a $50,000 civil money penalty to the U.S. Additionally, according to the DOJ, the defendant has committed under the two-year agreement to waive wait time fees for all riders who certify that they (or someone they frequently travel with) need more time to get in a car due to a disability. Among other things, the defendant also will ensure that refunds are easily available for anyone who does not have a waiver and is charged a wait time fee because of disability.
FHFA launches Office of Financial Technology
On July 18, FHFA announced the establishment of the Office of Financial Technology to help address emerging fintech risks and priorities. The new office will support the agency in: (i) developing strategies for FHFA-regulated entities to advance safe, responsible, and equitable fintech innovation; (ii) sharing best practices related to fintech in housing finance; (iii) establishing outreach through regulated entities to promote awareness and understanding of fintech innovation; (iv) facilitating interagency collaboration and partnerships with other regulators; and (v) providing resources on innovation, general trends, and emerging risks in housing finance. The new office will also help develop strategies for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks to advance fintech in a responsible manner.
The agency also issued a request for information (RFI) on the role of financial technology in housing finance and the risks and opportunities presented by technology throughout the mortgage lifecycle. Among other things, the RFI seeks feedback on ways the agency can “constructively interact with other stakeholders to facilitate responsible innovation, including the identification of any barriers to or challenges in implementing fintech in the housing finance ecosystem, while also focusing on supporting equity in the housing finance landscape for both homeowners and renters.” FHFA stated it also has an interest in understanding ways technology might automate and increase the effectiveness of compliance and regulatory processes (broadly referred to as “regtech”), commenting that “[r]egtech provides an opportunity to enhance transparency, consistency, and standardization of those processes, while reducing compliance costs.” Comments are due by October 16.
Fed issues NPRM for default rules on certain LIBOR contracts
On July 19, the Federal Reserve Board announced in a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that it is soliciting comments on a proposal that provides default rules for certain contracts that use LIBOR, which would implement the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act. As previously covered by InfoBytes, LIBOR will be discontinued after June 30, 2023. The NPRM would establish benchmark replacements for the one-, three-, six-, and 12-month “tenors” of LIBOR where a given contract does not have terms that provide for the use of any substitute for the specified LIBOR rate. According to the NPRM, “[o]f particular concern are so-called ‘tough legacy contracts,’ which are contracts that reference USD LIBOR and will not mature by June 30, 2023, but which lack adequate fallback provisions providing for a clearly defined or practicable replacement benchmark following the cessation of USD LIBOR.” The proposal identifies separate Fed-selected replacement rates for derivatives transactions, contracts where a government-sponsored enterprise is a party, and all other affected contracts. As required by the law, each proposed replacement rate is based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate. Comments on the proposal are due 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
Find continuing InfoBytes coverage on LIBOR here.
Hsu highlights financial health for consumers
On July 14, acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael J. Hsu delivered remarks before the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Literacy Education Commission (FLEC) discussing financial health for consumers. Hsu began by emphasizing that those who are invested in crypto-assets “are disproportionately young, diverse, and underbanked.” He noted the need “to take a careful and cautious approach” to crypto-assets, and then described the agency’s November 2021 reminder to national banks that their crypto activities must “be done in a safe, sound, and fair manner and that they need to obtain supervisory non-objections from us before engaging in new activities.” Hsu also mentioned that the OCC staff joined the FLEC Digital Assets working group to develop consumer materials clearly explaining new products in the cryptocurrency arena. Additionally, Hsu discussed the OCC’s “Financial Health: Vital Signs” discussion series, which explores issues affecting consumer financial health and well-being (covered by InfoBytes here). He further explained that a “financial health lens focused on individuals and communities, rather than solely on products or services, should enable a more sophisticated and effective approach to balancing the financial empowerment and protection of consumers.” Hsu concluded by noting the second anniversary of “Project REACh,” an initiative to promote greater financial inclusion of underserved populations, as previously covered by InfoBytes.
FTC, NLRB sign MOU to protect workers in gig economy
On July 19, the FTC announced that it is joining with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (collectively, “Parties”) in a memorandum of understanding (MOU) intended to protect workers by promoting competitive U.S. labor markets and putting an end to unfair practices that harm workers in the “gig economy” and other labor markets. The MOU provides ways for the Parties to work together to address key issues, such as labor market concentration, one-sided contract terms, and labor developments in the gig economy. According to the MOU, the Parties recognize that ongoing interagency collaboration regarding “issues of common regulatory interest will help to protect workers against unfair methods of competition, unfair or deceptive acts or practices, and unfair labor practices.” The MOU also provides that the Parties will facilitate: (i) “information sharing and cross-agency consultations on an ad hoc basis for official law enforcement purposes, in a manner consistent with and permitted by the laws and regulations that govern the Parties”; (ii) “cross-agency training to educate each Party about the laws and regulations enforced by the other Party”; and (iii) “coordinated outreach and education as appropriate.” According to the FTC, the MOU “is part of a broader FTC initiative to use the agency’s full authority[.]” The announcement also described the FTC’s recent efforts to root out deceptive and unfair acts and practices aimed at workers, “particularly those in the ‘gig economy’ who often don’t enjoy the full protections of traditional employment relationship.”
House passes bill to expand AML regulation
On July 20, the U.S. House passed H.R. 7900 with a 329-101 vote. Section 5401 of the bill, if passed, would amend the Bank Secrecy Act to require that professional service providers who “serve as key gatekeepers to the U.S. financial system adopt anti-money laundering procedures that can help detect and prevent the laundering of corrupt and other criminal funds into the United States.” Section 5401 calls for the imposition of anti-money laundering requirements on any person, excluding any governmental entity, employee, or agent, who engages in any activity which the Secretary determines by regulation to be the provision, with or without compensation, of (i) corporate or other legal entity arrangement, association, or formation services; (ii) trust services; or (iii) third party payment services, among other things. The strategy is intended to combat money laundering through shell companies by imposing anti-money laundering requirements on persons who act as gatekeepers for legal entities to enter the United States.
FDIC announces Oklahoma, Montana disaster relief
On July 15, the FDIC issued guidance (see FIL-31-2022 and see FIL-32-2022) to provide regulatory relief to financial institutions and help facilitate recovery in areas of Oklahoma affected by a severe storm, tornadoes, and flooding that occurred between May 2 and 8 and in areas of Montana affected by a severe storm and flooding that occurred from June 10 and continuing. The FDIC writes that, in supervising impacted institutions, it will consider the unusual circumstances those institutions face. The guidance suggests that institutions work with borrowers impacted by the severe weather to extend repayment terms, restructure existing loans, or ease terms for new loans “in a manner consistent with sound banking practices.” The FDIC notes that institutions may receive favorable Community Reinvestment Act consideration for community development loans, investments, and services in support of disaster recovery. The agency will also consider relief from certain reporting and publishing requirements.
FDIC clarifies third party-related brokered deposit reporting requirements
On July 15, the FDIC released a new Question and Answer (Q&A) and updated public information on its Banker Resource Center Brokered Deposits Page, reminding “FDIC-insured depository institutions (IDIs) that deposits swept from broker dealers with a primary purpose exception to unaffiliated IDIs must be reported as brokered if any additional third parties are involved that qualify as deposit brokers, as defined by Section 337.6 –Brokered Deposits, of the FDIC’s Rules and Regulations.” According to a statement released by the FDIC, Call Report data analysis submitted after the Brokered Deposits Final Rule took effect “suggests that some IDIs receiving sweep deposits from unaffiliated broker-dealers appear to be reporting the sweep deposits as non-brokered, despite the involvement of a third party that engages in facilitating the placement of deposits, including through engaging in matchmaking activities.” The agency emphasized that while an IDI may not have a direct relationship with an additional third party providing services to a broker dealer with a primary purpose exception, “when reporting sweep deposits, it is the IDI’s responsibility to file accurate Call Report data,” which may include reviewing agreements between the broker dealer and any additional third parties for any services that constitute matchmaking activities. The FDIC clarified, however, that banks will not be required to refile previous Call Reports “if, after good faith efforts, certain deposits were not previously reported as brokered by the IDI due to a misunderstanding of how the facilitation aspect of the deposit broker definition applies when additional third parties are involved.”