InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
OCC’s Hsu discusses climate financial risk management, diversity and inclusion
On March 7, acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael J. Hsu spoke before the Institute of International Bankers Annual Washington Conference to discuss climate-related financial risk and diversity and inclusion in the banking industry. In his remarks, Hsu described the agency as “laser-focused on the safety and soundness aspects of climate change risks.” Specifically, he noted that the OCC is concentrating on “large banks’ climate risk management capabilities: identifying, measuring, monitoring and mitigating climate-related exposures and risks.” He stated that “[w]eaknesses in risk management could adversely affect a bank’s safety and soundness, as well as the overall financial system.” Hsu also stressed the importance of cyber defense, saying “[h]eightened vigilance is clearly warranted.”
Hsu further discussed draft principles, which were released in December 2021, and are intended to support the identification and management of climate-related financial risks at OCC-regulated institutions with over $100 billion in total consolidated assets. (Covered by InfoBytes here). He noted that the principles will be finalized later this year when more detailed guidance will be developed in collaboration with the Federal Reserve Board and FDIC. After “an appropriate transition period,” Hsu noted that an assessment of large banks’ climate risk management capabilities would begin. He also noted that for midsize and community banks, it will be a number of years before OCC examiners conduct climate risk management examinations and suggested to bankers to use time “wisely.”
At the end of his remarks, Hsu compared “diversity and inclusion” to “safety and soundness,” in that it should be treated as a single idea, and without it, “diversity over time becomes a box to be checked, not a state to strive for or a value to be upheld.”
OCC issues CRA FAQs
On February 22, the OCC issued Bulletin 2022-4 announcing responses to frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding the December 2021 final rule rescinding the OCC’s Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) rule issued in June 2020. (The December 2021 final rule was covered by InfoBytes here.) According to the OCC, highlights of the FAQs include providing general information regarding the final rule, and addressing inquires related to, among other things: (i) the impact of the final rule on CRA bank type; (ii) qualifying activities and the qualifying activity confirmation request system; (iii) the transition period; (vi) examination administration; and (v) assessment areas.
OCC announces SASS deputy comptroller
On January 25, the OCC announced that Mark Pocock will serve as the Deputy Comptroller for Supervisory Systems & Analytical Support (SSAS) staring in February. Previously, Mr. Pocock was a Lead Expert in Systemic Risk Identification Support & Specialty Supervision, where he was an advisor to the Deputy Comptroller for special projects. According to the OCC, as Deputy Comptroller for SSAS, “Mr. Pocock will oversee a team that identifies, monitors, develops, and presents reports on existing and emerging risks and serves as a centralized risk analysis unit,” in addition to “oversee[ing] supervision data and information systems, business intelligence and reporting, and analysis teams who perform assessments of supervision and systemic risk.”
OCC formally rescinds CRA rule
On December 14, the OCC issued a final rule rescinding its 2020 Community Reinvestment Act Rule (2020 Rule) and replacing it with a rule based largely on the prior rules adopted jointly by the federal banking agencies in 1995, as amended (1995 Rules). (See also OCC Bulletin 2021-16.) According to the OCC, the “action is intended to facilitate the ongoing interagency work to modernize the CRA regulatory framework and promote consistency for all insured depository institutions.” As previously covered by a Buckley Special Alert, the 2020 Rule was intended to modernize the regulatory framework implementing the CRA and provided for at least a 27-month transition period for compliance based on a bank’s size and business model, among other things.
In September, the OCC solicited comments on a proposal to rescind the 2020 Rule (NPRM) and issued a series of frequently asked questions discussing the rulemaking process and providing a general timeline on the transition from the 2020 Rule (covered by InfoBytes here and here). The FAQs addressed questions including concerns related to the transition period for tracking activities that qualify under the 2020 Rule but would not qualify should the 1995 Rules be reinstated. The OCC announced that after reviewing transition issue comments received on the NPRM, the final rule had been adopted largely without modification. The final rule carries a compliance date of January 1, 2022, for all national banks and federal and state savings associations, with the exception of the final rule’s public file and public notice provisions, which have a delayed compliance date of April 1, 2022. According to the OCC, transitioning back to the 1995 Rules should carry a limited burden as the June 2020 Rule had only been partially implemented.
The OCC further noted that “strategic plans approved under the June 2020 Rule may remain in effect” but that “these plans must comply with the provisions of the final rule, as applicable.” Also, since the final rule stipulates that a bank’s record of helping to meet the credit needs of its assessment area(s) will be taken into consideration, “provisions in strategic plans that include goals for activities outside a bank’s assessment area(s) will no longer be applicable, and the OCC will no longer evaluate these activities when assessing the bank’s performance.” Additionally, the OCC stated that the new rule is intended to limit the CRA burden on banks, bank communities, and examiners while ensuring that insured depository institutions can “meet the credit needs of their entire communities, including low- and moderate-income [] neighborhoods,” consistent with safe and sound operations.
CFPB publishes fall 2021 rulemaking agenda
On December 13, the Office of Information And Regulatory Affairs released the CFPB’s fall 2021 rulemaking agenda. According to a Bureau announcement, the information released represents regulatory matters the Bureau plans to pursue during the period from November 2, 2021 to October 31, 2022. Additionally, the Bureau stated that the latest agenda reflects continued rulemakings intended to further its consumer financial protection mission and help advance the country’s economic recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic. Promoting racial and economic equity and supporting underserved and marginalized communities’ access to fair and affordable credit continue to be Bureau priorities.
Key rulemaking initiatives include:
- Small Business Rulemaking. This fall, the Bureau issued its long-awaited proposed rule (NPRM) for Section 1071 regulations, which would require a broad swath of lenders to collect data on loans they make to small businesses, including information about the loans themselves, the characteristics of the borrower, and demographic information regarding the borrower’s principal owners. (Covered by a Buckley Special Alert.) The NPRM comment period goes through January 6, 2022, after which point the Bureau will review comments as it moves to develop a final rule. Find continuing Section 1071 coverage here.
- Consumer Access to Financial Records. The Bureau noted that it is working on rulemaking to implement Section 1033 of Dodd-Frank in order to address the availability of electronic consumer financial account data. The Bureau is currently reviewing comments received in response to an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) issued fall 2020 regarding consumer data access (covered by InfoBytes here). Additionally, the Bureau stated it is monitoring the market to consider potential next steps, “including whether a Small Business Review Panel is required pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act.”
- Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the Bureau published an ANPR in March 2019 seeking feedback on the unique features of PACE financing and the general implications of regulating PACE financing under TILA (as required by Section 307 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, which amended TILA to mandate that the Bureau issue certain regulations relating to PACE financing). The Bureau noted that it continues “to engage with stakeholders and collect information for the rulemaking, including by pursuing quantitative data on the effect of PACE on consumers’ financial outcomes.”
- Automated Valuation Models (AVM). Interagency rulemaking is currently being pursued by the Bureau, Federal Reserve Board, OCC, FDIC, NCUA, and FHFA to develop regulations for AVM quality control standards as required by Dodd-Frank amendments to FIRREA. The standards are designed to, among other things, “ensure a high level of confidence in the estimates produced by the valuation models, protect against the manipulation of data, seek to avoid conflicts of interest, require random sample testing and reviews,” and account for any other appropriate factors. An NPRM is anticipated for June 2022.
- Amendments to Regulation Z to Facilitate LIBOR Transition. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the Bureau issued a final rule on December 7 to facilitate the transition from LIBOR for consumer financial products, including “adjustable-rate mortgages, credit cards, student loans, reverse mortgages, [and] home equity lines of credit,” among others. The final rule amended Regulation Z, which implements TILA, to generally address LIBOR’s eventual cessation for most U.S. dollar settings in June 2023, and establish requirements for how creditors must select replacement indices for existing LIBOR-linked consumer loans. The final rule generally takes effect April 1, 2022.
- Reviewing Existing Regulations. The Bureau noted in its announcement that it decided to conduct an assessment of a rule implementing HMDA (most of which took effect January 2018), and referred to a notice and request for comments issued last month (covered by InfoBytes here), which solicited public comments on its plans to assess the effectiveness of the HMDA Rule. Additionally, the Bureau stated that it finished a review of Regulation Z rules implementing the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, and that “[a]fter considering the statutory review factors and public comments,” it “determined that the CARD Act rules should continue without change.”
Notably, there are 14 rulemaking activities that are listed as inactive on the fall 2021 agenda, including rulemakings on overdraft services, consumer reporting, student loan servicing, Regulation E modernization, abusive acts and practices, loan originator compensation, and TILA/RESPA mortgage disclosure integration.
OCC releases 2022 fees and assessments schedule
On December 1, the OCC issued Bulletin 2021-58, which informs all national banks, federal savings associations, and federal branches and agencies of foreign banks of the agency’s 2022 fees and assessment rates. The OCC noted that for the 2022 assessment year, among other things, (i) there will be no inflation adjustment to assessment rates; (ii) new entrants to the federal banking system will be assessed on a prorated basis using call report information as of December 31 or June 30, depending on the entrance date; and (iii) the hourly fee for special examinations and investigations will increase from $150 to $155. The bulletin takes effect January 1, 2022.
Agencies end Covid mortgage servicing flexibility
On November 10, the OCC, Federal Reserve Board, CFPB, FDIC, NCUA, and state financial regulators issued a joint statement announcing the end to temporary supervisory and enforcement flexibility provided to mortgage servicers due to the Covid-19 pandemic by the agencies’ April 3, 2020 joint statement. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the April 2020 joint statement provided mortgage servicers greater flexibility to provide CARES Act forbearance of up to 180 days and other short-term options upon the request of borrowers with federally backed mortgages without having to adhere to otherwise applicable rules. The April 2020 joint statement also announced that agencies would not take supervisory or enforcement action against mortgage servicers for failing to meet certain timing requirements under the mortgage servicing rules provided that servicers made good faith efforts to provide required notices or disclosures and took related actions within a reasonable time period.
The agencies noted in their announcement that while the pandemic continues to affect consumers and mortgage servicers, servicers have had sufficient time to take measures to assist impacted consumers and develop more robust business continuity and remote work capabilities. Accordingly, the agencies “will apply their respective supervisory and enforcement authorities, when appropriate, to address any noncompliance or violations of the Regulation X mortgage servicing rules that occur after the date of this statement.” However, the agencies will take into consideration, when appropriate, “the specific impact of servicers’ challenges that arise due to the COVID-19 pandemic and take those issues in account when considering any supervisory and enforcement actions,” including factoring in the time it may take “to make operational adjustments in connection with this joint statement.”
The same day, the Bureau released a report titled Mortgage Servicing Efforts in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic, summarizing efforts taken by the Bureau since the start of the pandemic to respond to the evolving needs of homeowners and CFPB-supervised entities. These responses include: (i) conducting prioritized assessments and targeted supervisory reviews; (ii) issuing reminders to servicers that being “unprepared is unacceptable”; (iii) implementing temporary procedural safeguards to allow borrowers time to explore options before foreclosure; (vi) analyzing consumer complaint data and conducting targeted reviews of high-risk complaints related to pandemic forbearances; (v) analyzing and releasing information relating to mortgage servicers’ pandemic responses; (vi) documenting research on the pandemic’s disproportionate impact on Black, Hispanic, and low-income communities; and (vii) partnering with other federal agencies to create online tools to provide information on CARES Act assistance and protections, as well as providing homeowner outreach materials. The Bureau noted it “will continue to monitor closely the performance of mortgage servicers to prevent avoidable foreclosures to the maximum extent possible and will not hesitate to take supervisory or enforcement action if warranted.”
OCC releases FAQs on proposal to rescind 2020 CRA rule
On October 26, the OCC issued responses to frequently asked questions on its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to rescind its 2020 Community Reinvestment Act Rule (2020 Rule) and to replace it with rules based largely on those adopted jointly by the federal banking agencies in 1995, as amended. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the OCC noted it intends to align the agency’s CRA rules with current Federal Reserve Board and FDIC rules, “thereby facilitat[ing] the on-going interagency work to modernize the CRA regulatory framework and create consistency for all insured depository institutions.” The FAQs discuss the rulemaking process and provide a general timeline on the transition from the 2020 Rule. The FAQs also answer questions concerning: (i) CRA bank-type determinations; (ii) qualifying activity determinations; (iii) the qualifying activity confirmation request system; (iv) the transition period for tracking activities that qualify under the 2020 Rule but would not qualify should the 1995 rules be reinstated; (v) examination administration; (vii) assessment areas; (vii) targeted geographic areas; (viii) strategic plans; and (ix) submitting public comments.
OCC issues updated LIBOR self-assessment tool
On October 18, the OCC released an updated self-assessment tool for banks to evaluate their preparedness for the LIBOR cessation at the end of the year. The updated guidance reminds banks that they should cease entering into new contracts using LIBOR as a reference rate as soon as practicable but no later than December 31, 2021. The self-assessment tool may be used by banks to identify and mitigate a bank’s LIBOR transition risks, and management should use the tool to evaluate whether preparations for the transition are sufficient. The OCC notes that “LIBOR exposure and risk assessments and cessation preparedness plans should be complete or near completion with appropriate management oversight and reporting in place,” and “most banks should be working toward resolving replacement rate issues while communicating with affected customers and third parties, as applicable.” The OCC also reminds banks to tailor risk management processes to the size and complexity of a bank’s LIBOR exposures and “consider all applicable risks (e.g., operational, compliance, strategic, and reputation) when scoping and completing LIBOR cessation preparedness assessments.”
Bulletin 2021-46 rescinds Bulletin 2021-7 published in February (covered by InfoBytes here).
OCC releases bank supervision operating plan for FY 2022
On October 15, the OCC’s Committee on Bank Supervision released its bank supervision operating plan for fiscal year 2022. The plan outlines the agency’s supervision priorities and highlights several supervisory focus areas including: (i) strategic and operational planning; (ii) credit risk management, including allowances for loan and lease losses and credit losses; (iii) cybersecurity and operational resiliency; (iv) third-party oversight; (v) Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering compliance; (vi) consumer compliance management systems and fair lending risk assessments; (vii) Community Reinvestment Act performance; (viii) LIBOR phase-out preparations; (ix) payment systems products and services; (x) fintech partnerships involving potential cryptocurrency-related activities and other services; and (xi) climate-change risk management. The plan will be used by OCC staff members to guide the development of supervisory strategies for individual national banks, federal savings associations, federal branches, federal agencies, and technology service providers.
The OCC will provide updates about these priorities in its Semiannual Risk Perspective, as InfoBytes has previously covered.