Debt Collection & Buying
Well versed in collection lawLegal 500
Practice Overview
Buckley represents major creditors on issues involving in-house collection operations, debt purchasers, and third-party debt collectors. Our team includes attorneys with private sector debt collection backgrounds and government experience, including as a former deputy general counsel of a publicly traded debt purchasing and collection firm; a former Federal Trade Commission (FTC) attorney with significant governmental experience addressing debt collection issues; and long-time outside counsel to the nation’s largest creditors and collection companies. We offer a unique perspective on risk mitigation options and a practical understanding of what regulators and enforcement agencies expect from the industry.
Our team is involved in debt collection matters on a regular basis, handling a variety of regulatory, transactional, litigation, and enforcement matters related to first- and third-party collections. We also have handled numerous matters advising clients on the risks and mitigants related to the use of social media and other technologies in the context of debt collection. Our experience includes: evaluating and applying state and federal law; drafting corporate policies and procedures tailored to each client’s specific circumstances; risk assessments, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) gap analyses, and CFPB supervisory examinations; and the design, review, and implementation of vendor management guidelines.
We also represent the private equity and strategic investors who buy and sell collection companies and debt portfolios. We have advised on and performed due diligence for parties involved in some of the largest transactions in the receivables management space in recent years, as well as resulting licensing and change-in-control filings with state licensing authorities.
Our firm has a track record of success defending clients in debt collection litigation and enforcement matters before the CFPB, FTC, and other federal and state agencies. We are well-versed in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), and state collection laws, including application of unfair or deceptive acts or practices (UDAP) laws. We understand the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), and data protection / breach regulation, particularly as such laws are applied to debt collection.
In the post-Dodd-Frank era, creditors selling portfolios of nonperforming debt must understand the regulatory challenges governing the sale of consumer debt in order to mitigate the potential risk and liabilities involved, including risks that may result from the acts of those to whom the debt has been sold. Buckley provides counsel in developing, implementing, and maintaining robust debt sales measures that comply with OCC Bulletin 2014-37, CFPB guidance, and other applicable laws that impact debt sales and purchases.
Well versed in collection lawLegal 500
Articles
"Neither forgiven nor forgotten: Taxation and UDAAP concerns with collecting charged off debt" by John C. Redding, Sasha Leonhardt, and Jessica M. Shannon (Bloomberg BNA)
When debtors are unable to pay their debts, creditors are left with a choice: (i) allow the consumer to pay a lesser amount, if possible, to settle the obligation and recover some funds; or (ii) charge off the debt and cease all collection efforts. Regardless of the path chosen, each has potential...
Articles"Between a Rock and Hard Place: Debt Collection, Consumer Remediation and Tax Consequences" by John C. Redding, Sasha Leonhardt, and Jessica M. Shannon (Bloomberg BNA)
In recent years, debt collection has become a focal point for regulatory oversight and government enforcement actions. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) considers debt collection to be a priority and scrutinizes the conduct of debt collectors for violations of the Fair Debt Collection...
Articles"The role of State AGs in solving student loan crisis" by Douglas F. Gansler, Sasha Leonhardt, and Dana Walsh Kumar (Law360)
State attorneys general are the chief legal officers of their state; state attorneys general are the chief law enforcement officers of their state; and state attorneys general must protect their citizens and vigorously enforce their state’s consumer protection statutes. As broad as these powers and...
ArticlesSpecial Alert: Supreme Court Holds that a Person May Collect Defaulted Debts Purchased for Its Own Account Without Triggering the FDCPA
On June 12, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., affirming the Fourth Circuit’s holding that the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act’s (“FDCPA” or the “Act”) definition of the term “debt collector” does not necessarily apply to a company...
ArticlesSpecial Alert: Madden Class Action Moves Forward
On February 27, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a ruling in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC , [1] holding that New York’s fundamental public policy against usury overrides a Delaware choice-of-law clause in the plaintiff’s credit card agreement. The court allowed...
ArticlesSpecial Alert: CFPB Releases Outline of Proposed Rule for Third Party Debt Collectors
On July 28, the CFPB announced that it is considering proposing a rule to “overhaul the debt collection market by capping collector contact attempts and by helping to ensure that companies collect the correct debt.” The CFPB released several related documents, including a report on third-party debt...
Articles"Key Points in the CFPB’s Outline of Proposed Rule for Third Party Debt Collectors" By Marshall T. Bell, John C. Redding, and Walter E. Zalenski (Consumer Finance Law Quarterly Report)
On July 28, 2016 the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) announced that it is considering proposing a rule to “overhaul the debt collection market by capping collector contact attempts and by helping to ensure that companies collect the correct debt.” The CFPB released several related...
ArticlesDebt Collection and Beyond in 2015
In 2015, the CFPB further expanded its reach into debt collection through a number of enforcement actions. The CFPB also continues to conduct research on a potential rulemaking regarding debt collection activities, which may address information accuracy concerns involving debt sales and other...
ArticlesNew Day For RESPA: The UDAAPification Of Section 8
The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act has gone the "UDAAPified" way of debt collection — this time, through enforcement rather than guidance. In July 2013, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Bulletin 2013-07 announced that the principles underlying the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act...
ArticlesDebt Collection in the Post Dodd-Frank Enforcement Era
John Redding, Sasha Leonhardt, and Jessica Pollet authored "Debt Collection in the Post Dodd-Frank Enforcement Era," which appeared in the January/February issue of The Journal of Taxation and Regulation of Financial Institutions. Since the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act, government agencies have...
Articles
News & Blogs
Kraninger’s focus is preventing consumer harm, clarifying “abusive”
On April 17, Kathy Kraninger, Director of the CFPB, spoke before the Bipartisan Policy Center where she reiterated the Bureau’s focus on prevention of harm and announced a symposium that will explore the meaning of “abusive acts or practices” under Section 1031 of the Dodd-Frank Act. In her remarks...
InfoBytesNew Mexico amends financial lending licensing requirements
On April 2, the New Mexico governor signed HB 584 , which amends the Collection Agency Regulatory Act and the Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act to, among other things, require sales finance companies obtain a license to conduct business in the state. The bill outlines licensing requirements for such...
InfoBytes11th Circuit: An implicit threat of litigation is enough to assert a FDCPA claim
On April 5, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court’s order dismissing a plaintiff’s action alleging a debt collector violated the FDCPA when attempting to collect on a time-barred debt. According to the opinion, the plaintiff brought a...
InfoBytesDistrict Court: Using department store name as creditor is not prohibited under the FDCPA
On March 21, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida granted a debt collector’s motion for summary judgment in an action alleging that the debt collector violated the FDCPA by failing to name the creditor to whom the debt was owed. According to the opinion, the debt collector...
InfoBytes11th Circuit: SOL begins on date of mortgage loan acceleration
On March 11, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of a consumer’s FDCPA action. The consumer alleged that his mortgage servicer violated the FDCPA by attempting to collect overdue payments beyond Florida’s five-year statute of limitations for foreclosure...
InfoBytes9th Circuit: Administrator vicariously liable for debt collectors’ alleged TCPA violations
On March 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit reversed a lower court’s decision to dismiss TCPA claims against a student loan administrator (defendant), finding that the administrator could be held vicariously liable for a contractor’s alleged debt collection attempts. The plaintiff...
InfoBytesDistrict Court: Debt collector did not buy right to arbitrate with credit card account
On March 22, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled that a debt collector (defendant) who purchased a consumer’s credit card account failed to establish that the sale of the account included the sale of the right to arbitrate disputes relating to the account...
InfoBytesDistrict Court partially grants summary judgment in favor of CFPB in debt collection action
On March 21, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia partially granted the CFPB’s motion for summary judgment against a New York-based company and three individuals for allegedly violating the CFPA and the FDCPA in a debt collection operation, but denied the motion for the...
InfoBytesSupreme Court: Law firms conducting nonjudicial foreclosures are not debt collectors under FDCPA
On March 20, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a 2018 10th Circuit decision, holding that law firms performing nonjudicial foreclosures are not “debt collectors” under the FDCPA. Justice Breyer delivered the opinion, which resolves whether FDCPA protections apply to nonjudicial...
InfoBytesCFPB and FTC release 2018 FDCPA report
On March 20, the CFPB and the FTC released ( here and here ) their annual report to Congress on the administration of the FDCPA, which highlights the 2018 efforts of the agencies. The agencies coordinate in enforcement; share supervisory and consumer complaint information; and collaborate on...
InfoBytes
Webcasts & Speaking Engagements
Andrew R. Louis discussed "Hot issues in sports ticketing" at the NFL Club Counsel Seminar
This session discussed the legal risks related to terms and conditions of season passes and tickets, as well as potential triggers for TILA and TCPA liability. This was a closed event.
Speaking Engagement
Press Releases & Announcements
Buckley Sandler launches APPROVED licensing service
WASHINGTON, D.C. (March 7, 2018) – Buckley Sandler LLP today formally announced the launch of APPROVED , a new approach to licensing for financial services companies. Buckley Sandler is building upon years of financial services experience and licensing know-how to offer APPROVED, a technology-...
Press Releases
Our Debt Collection & Buying Team
Partners
Recent Blog Posts
-
April 19, 2019
Kraninger’s focus is preventing consumer harm, clarifying “abusive”
-
April 12, 2019
New Mexico amends financial lending licensing requirements
-
April 12, 2019
11th Circuit: An implicit threat of litigation is enough to assert a FDCPA claim
-
April 4, 2019
District Court: Using department store name as creditor is not prohibited under the FDCPA
-
March 29, 2019
11th Circuit: SOL begins on date of mortgage loan acceleration