InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
District court grants preliminary injunction against PPP Ineligibility Rule
On May 11, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Ineligibility Rule, concluding that the rule—which excludes “banks, political lobbying firms, certain private clubs with restrictive admissions practices, and sexually oriented businesses that present entertainment or sell products of a ‘prurient’ (but not unlawful) nature” from PPP loan eligibility—contravenes the purpose of the PPP. According to the opinion, a group of businesses that “provide lawful ‘clothed, semi-nude, and/or nude performance entertainment’” filed suit against the SBA seeking a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the PPP Ineligibility Rule, after they were prevented from obtaining the loans and/or participating in the PPP because their businesses were deemed to be “of a ‘prurient sexual nature.’” The SBA argued that Congress could not have intended to support businesses that the SBA has historically denied financing, saying it would lead to “absurd results.” The court rejected this argument, stating, “these are no ordinary times, and the PPP is no ordinary legislation.” The court reasoned that because the intent of the CARES Act, which houses the PPP, is to protect workers in need, it is “not absurd to conclude” that in order to support workers from all businesses, Congress would temporarily permit SBA financial assistance to previously excluded business types. Finding that the Rule is in conflict with the Congressional purpose of the PPP, the court granted the preliminary injunction barring the SBA from enforcing the Rule.
New York extends moratorium on evictions and foreclosures
The governor of New York issued Executive Order 202.28, extending through June 6 the moratorium on evictions of residential or commercial tenants for nonpayment of rent or foreclosure of a residential or commercial mortgage for nonpayment for a period of sixty days beginning on June 20. The moratorium applies only to properties owned or rented by someone that is eligible for unemployment insurance or benefits or is otherwise facing hardship due to the Covid-19 outbreak.
Alabama clarifies proclamation regarding eviction moratorium
On May 8, the Alabama governor issued a Ninth Supplemental Proclamation amending an earlier proclamation providing relief from residential evictions and foreclosures, which we previously covered here. The earlier proclamation is amended to specify that the protection against evictions applies only to evictions based on nonpayment. The proclamation also extends the state of emergency issued on March 13, 2020, for an additional sixty days, unless sooner terminated. The proclamation will remain in effect for the duration of the public health emergency unless rescinded or extended by another proclamation.
Agencies jointly release fact sheets for services and consumers regarding CARES Act forbearance
The Federal Housing Administration, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Rural Housing Service have jointly issued fact sheets for servicers and for consumers outlining certain requirements and obligations under CARES Act mortgage payment forbearance. The fact sheet for servicers provides guidance for assisting and educating borrowers and explains that loss mitigation options will vary based on the program under which the loan is insured or guaranteed. The fact sheet for consumers provides guidance on requesting forbearance and information on the forbearance program.
Fed report discusses banking system, cancels non-critical examinations
On May 8, the Federal Reserve Board (Fed) issued its Supervision and Regulation Report, which summarizes banking system conditions and the Fed’s supervisory and regulatory activities. The annual report discusses the safety and soundness of the banking industry, and explains the Fed’s response to Covid-19 pandemic. The report notes that actions taken by the Fed “use existing flexibility in the regulatory and supervisory framework and do not roll back the measures that allowed the banking sector to enter this crisis as a source of strength….” The report emphasizes that the banking system started 2020 in a healthy financial position, which helped enable institutions to “absorb higher credit losses will continuing to lend during times of stress.” The report notes that banks are facing significant operational challenges as a result of social distancing measures, and that during the first quarter of 2020, U.S. bank earnings declined sharply; however, strains in bank funding markets have somewhat eased since their stressed condition in March. As for the Fed’s supervisory activities, the report states that the Fed has deferred or cancelled non-critical examinations at large financial institutions for the remainder of the year. Specifically, the report notes that “examination activity will reflect operating conditions and will continue to target areas of heightened risk due to containment measure-related developments as well as known deficiencies that existed prior to the current crisis.”
Agencies extend two resolution plan filing deadlines
On May 6, the FDIC and Federal Reserve extended the following two upcoming resolution plan filing deadlines for certain banks in light of recent challenges arising from Covid-19:
- September 29, 2020 (90 day extension). This extension applies to the four institutions required to submit plans to address previously identified shortcomings.
- September 29, 2021 (90 day extension). This extension applies to the targeted resolution plans to be submitted by large foreign and domestic Category II and Category III banks under the agencies’ large bank regulatory framework.
Resolution plans for the eight global systemically important banks are still due July 1, 2021, however the agencies noted that they “will monitor conditions and may adjust this deadline if warranted.”
SBA, Treasury extend PPP certification safe harbor
During the week ending May 8, the Small Business Administration (SBA) in consultation with the Treasury Department (Treasury) updated the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) to, among other things, provide guidance on the PPP safe harbor and counting a small business’s employees for the 500 or fewer employee requirement. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the SBA will deem that the borrower certification on a loan application was made in good faith if a recipient of a PPP loan prior to April 24 determines it may have other forms of liquidity and repays the loan by the safe harbor deadline of May 7. SBA extended the safe harbor for repayment from May 7 to May 14. The FAQs also provide that a small business must include foreign affiliate employees when calculating how many people it employs for purposes of determining if the business meets the PPP eligibility requirement of 500 or fewer employees. Additionally, the updated FAQs also explain that a PPP loan recipient that makes a good faith attempt, in writing, to rehire a furloughed employee, will not be penalized by a reduction in loan forgiveness it receives if that employee rejects the offer. New FAQs also cover how to calculate maximum PPP loan amounts for seasonal employers and whether nonprofit hospitals qualify for PPP loans.
District of Columbia Department of Insurance, Securities and Banking issues FAQs on mortgage deferment
The District of Columbia Department of Insurance, Securities and Banking issued responses to frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding the residential and commercial mortgage deferment program under the District of Columbia’s Covid-19 Response Supplemental Emergency Amendment Act of 2020. The FAQs provide guidance on, among other things, which entities and financial institutions are considered mortgage lenders under the act and therefore subject to the requirements, mortgage lenders’ obligations under the act, how borrowers should apply for the mortgage deferment plan, and record-keeping requirements under the act.
FDIC updates Covid-19 FAQs
On May 7, the FDIC updated its list of frequently asked questions for financial institutions affected by Covid-19. The recent updates include the addition of one FAQ describing amendments to Regulation D that remove the six-per-month limit on transfers and withdrawals from savings deposits and one FAQ that discusses additional grace periods for force-placed flood insurance.
California issues guidance for the reopening of real estate businesses
On May 7, California issued updated guidance for real estate transactions and an accompanying checklist for the real estate industry intended to minimize the spread of Covid-19 as these business gradually reopen as part of Stage 2 of the state’s roadmap for modifying the stay home order. The guidance includes protocols for the workplace and shown properties.