InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
OCC to host info sessions on PPP
On April 14, the OCC announced that the Office of Innovation will host three Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) listening sessions in April. The sessions will discuss questions and possible solutions for three PPP related topics. The first session covering payroll verification will be held on April 16, from 11:00 am to 1:00 pm (EDT), and will discuss how to make payroll verification quicker and more efficient for PPP loans. The second session, fraud identification, will be held on April 20, from 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm (EDT), to discuss possible methods for financial institutions to detect instances of fraud regarding the PPP. The third session will discuss backend processes, including identifying possible issues that may arise for financial institutions in monitoring PPP loans and in PPP loan forgiveness. This last session will be held on April 21, from 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm (EDT). Participants may share PPP concerns prior to the sessions by contacting the Office of Innovation here.
SBA provides additional guidance on PPP loans for self-employed, independent contractors
On April 14, the Small Business Administration (SBA) released an interim final rule to supplement the first Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Interim Final Rule issued April 2 (covered by InfoBytes here). This interim final rule provides additional guidance for filers of IRS Form 1040 Schedule C (individuals with self-employment income), information concerning eligibility issues for certain business concerns, and requirements for certain pledges of PPP loans. Specifically, self-employed individuals who filed Schedule C—such as independent contractors or sole proprietors in operation on February 15, 2020—are eligible for PPP loans, provided they meet specific criteria. The interim final rule provides instructions for calculating maximum loan amounts and states that self-employed loan recipients may use the proceeds for, among other things, owner compensation replacement, mortgage interest payments, and interest payments on debt obligations incurred prior to February 15, 2020. Details and clarification on restrictions, PPP loan forgiveness eligibility, and the types of permitted eligible businesses are also included.
The interim final rule takes effect upon publication in the Federal Register and applies to PPP applications submitted through June 30, 2020, or until funds designated for this purpose are exhausted. The SBA will also accept comments on the interim final rule for 30 days following publication.
SBA, Treasury release additional PPP FAQs
On April 15 and 14, the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Treasury Department (Treasury) provided additional guidance to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) frequently asked questions (FAQs) to address lender concerns about, among other things, application submissions, signature requirements, and applications from SBA employees and family. Some of the FAQs include the following guidance:
- Lenders may submit loan applications through E-Tran only after collecting the same borrower information and certifications contained in the application form, and performing a good faith review of the borrower’s payroll calculations.
- Lenders that submitted applications prior to April 14 without collecting the required borrower information and certifications must do so as soon as possible before loan closing.
- Lenders may accept scanned copies of loan applications, borrower certifications, and other required documents. E-sign compliant electronic signatures and consents may also be accepted.
On April 13, one of the SBA and Treasury FAQs—also included on FinCEN’s website along with FAQ 18—discusses beneficial ownership requirements for PPP loans. For new customers, lenders meet their beneficial ownership obligations by collecting the following information from natural persons with ownership stakes in the applicant of 20 percent or greater: “owner name, title, ownership %, TIN, address, and date of birth.” SBA and Treasury also released an FAQ that addressed lender submission requirements prior to issuing PPP loans. FAQ 21 states that lenders are required to sign the lender application form for the PPP (SBA Form 2484) in order to issue PPP loans, but lenders do not need a separate SBA Authorization. Terms and conditions in the lenders’ promissory note must be consistent with CARES Act sections 1102 and 1106 as well as the PPP Interim Final Rule. Additional FAQs from this date address nonbank lenders, the $10 million loan cap, and the affiliation rules applicability to various kinds of businesses.
Please see Buckley’s dedicated SBA page, which includes additional SBA resources.
FTC provides advice to mortgage borrowers impacted by Covid-19
On April 14, the FTC released guidance entitled “Coronavirus and your mortgage” to provide financial information to consumers affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. The guidance points out that many mortgage borrowers facing Covid-19-related financial hardships may benefit from CARES Act protections. Starting on March 18, borrowers with federally-backed mortgages cannot have foreclosure proceedings instituted against them for 60 days. The CARES Act also provides borrowers the right to request forbearance for up to 180 days in order to temporarily freeze or lower mortgage payments. After the forbearance period ends, borrowers may request an additional forbearance for up to 180 days if they are still having trouble making mortgage payments as a result Covid-19. The FTC’s guidance provides contact information for the GSEs so borrowers can determine if their mortgages are federally backed. In addition, the guidance encourages all borrowers to contact their servicers for available payment options and assistance. The FTC suggests that approved housing counselors may also help, and can be found on the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s website here, while the Homeownership Preservation Foundation may be able to assist borrowers in making payment arrangements with their mortgage servicers. (See website here.) The FTC advises borrowers to check state government websites for state-specific information, though the agency warns borrowers to be wary of mortgage relief scams. Finally, the guidance reminds borrowers never to pay up-front for help with their mortgage payments and provides additional links for more detailed information.
District court says CARES Act does not provide a private right of action under PPP loan provisions
On April 13, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland denied plaintiffs’ request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against a national bank, ruling that “the CARES Act does not expressly provide a private right of action” and that the bank’s Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) eligibility restrictions do not violate the Act. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the plaintiffs alleged that the bank prioritized existing lending clients in the PPP and limited access to depository-only customers that did not have a credit card or loan with another financial institution. The plaintiffs argued that the bank had no legal authority under the Act to deny, restrict, or impede access, even though there is no such prohibition in the Act.
The court first determined that the Act contains neither an express nor implied private right of action. Moreover, even if Congress did intend to provide a private right of action, the bank’s alleged conduct “does not run afoul” of the law. While the Act outlines requirements that banks must consider when offering loans to small businesses, it “does not constrain banks such that they are prohibited from considering other information when deciding from whom to accept applications, or in what order to process applications it accepts.” The court also rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that Congress waived the “credit elsewhere” requirement with respect to PPP loans. According to the court, “[t]ypically, when an entity applies for an SBA loan, it has to certify that it could not obtain a loan from a different source. . . . In this case, [the bank] has imposed no such requirement on businesses’ eligibility for the PPP.” The court also concluded that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, and that imposing a temporarily restraining order could disincentivize lenders from participating in the program and reduce small businesses’ access to PPP loans. “[G]iven the competing policy interests, the need to balance the desire to assist the widest swath of small businesses with the need to incentivize lender participation, and the overall fluidity of this epidemic, Congress is better positioned to remedy any defects in the CARES Act, and to pass the supplemental legislation it believes best aimed at ameliorating the effects of the COVID-19 crisis,” the court wrote.
On April 14, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
FINRA adds PPP question to Covid-19 FAQs
On April 13, FINRA updated its FAQs on regulatory relief due to Covid-19 to include an FAQ that addresses Paycheck Protection Program loans. The FAQ answers a question relating to loan forgiveness for registered persons, stating that the loan forgiveness amount will not be considered a “compromise with a creditor” and will not need to be reported on Form U4 for question 14K.
HUD announces multifamily mortgage payment relief
On April 13, HUD announced new measures for FHA-approved multifamily mortgagees regarding the implementation of CARES Act forbearance. The guidance stipulates that servicers must grant multifamily borrowers who experience financial hardships due to Covid-19 and request assistance up to 90 days of forbearance, and may grant this forbearance without receiving direct approval from HUD provided they follow guidance outlined in Mortgagee Letter 2020-09 (covered by InfoBytes here). As required by the CARES Act, all owners and agents of FHA-insured multifamily properties and properties participating in HUD multifamily assisted housing programs must also cease all evictions of tenants for non-payment of rent for 120 days. The guidance also outlines the standard multifamily forbearance protocol, which is intended to streamline processing for borrowers, servicers, and lenders. The protocol stipulates that HUD is (i) “allowing servicers to grant, without HUD approval, up to 30 days of forbearance for borrowers experiencing a financial hardship due to COVID-19 if the borrower was current on their mortgage payments as of February 1, 2020”; (ii) “allowing automatic forbearance extensions from servicers to borrowers for up to two additional 30-day periods, without HUD approval”; and (iii) “encouraging borrowers to enter into repayment plans with renters (residential and commercial) that experience an income reduction or temporary loss of household income but are able to make up the difference over time, without HUD approval.”
States ask Treasury to exempt stimulus payments from garnishment and urge CFPB to “vigorously enforce” FCRA
On April 13, a coalition of state attorneys general and the Hawaii Office of Consumer Protection (states) sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin, calling for immediate action to ensure that stimulus checks issued under the CARES Act to consumers affected by the Covid-19 pandemic are not subject to garnishment by creditors and debt collectors. While the CARES Act does not “explicitly designate these emergency stimulus payments as exempt from garnishment,” the states claim that a “built-in mechanism” contained within a provision of the CARES Act can rectify the legislative oversight. Specifically, the states point to Section 2201(h), which “authoriz[es] Treasury to issue ‘regulations or other guidance as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this section,’” and ask Treasury to immediately designate the stimulus checks as “‘benefit payments’ exempt from garnishment.”
The same day, another coalition of state attorneys general sent a letter to CFPB Director Kathy Kraninger urging the Bureau to rescind an April 1 policy statement directed at consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) and furnishers (covered by InfoBytes here) that stated the Bureau will take a “flexible supervisory and enforcement approach during this pandemic regarding compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act [(FCRA)] and Regulation V.” According to the states, the policy statement suggests that the Bureau does not plan on enforcing the CARES Act amendment to the FCRA, which requires lenders to report as current any loans subject to Covid-19 forbearance or other accommodation. The Bureau’s decision, the states contend, may discourage consumers from taking advantage of offered forbearances and other accommodations. The states also argue that allowing CRAs to take longer than the FCRA-prescribed 30 days to investigate consumer disputes puts consumers at risk. The states stress that the recent increase in Covid-19 scams has heightened the need for the Bureau to vigorously enforce the FCRA, and that, moreover, the thousands of complaints received by the states, FBI, FTC, and DOJ concerning phishing and other scams designed to gather consumers’ financial information have highlighted identity theft risks. The states emphasize “that even if the CFPB refuses to act. . .we will not hesitate to enforce the FCRA’s deadlines against companies that fail to comply with the law.”
CFPB issues guidance allowing pandemic relief payment distribution with prepaid cards
On April 13, the CFPB issued an Interpretive Rule (IR) addressing the “Treatment of Pandemic Relief Payments Under Regulation E and Application of the Compulsory Use Prohibition.” Pursuant to the CARES Act, many consumers are entitled to pandemic relief payments, generally provided through direct deposit to the consumer’s bank account. When that information is unavailable, or when the consumer does not have a bank account, the IR allows government agencies to provide the economic impact payments via alternative means, including by issuing prepaid account cards. However, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and implementing Regulation E prohibit government agencies from requiring consumers to “establish accounts for receipt of electronic fund transfers with a particular financial institution as a condition of receipt of a government benefit. ” According to the IR, the “compulsory use prohibition” will not apply to prepaid cards and the Covid-19 relief payments will not be classified as government benefits, provided the cards fulfill certain requirements. In order to not be considered “government benefits” the payments must: (i) be to aid consumers impacted by Covid-19; (ii) not be “part of an already-established government benefit program”; (iii) be distributed “on a one-time or otherwise limited basis”; and (iv) not require consumers to apply for the funds.
Treasury opens web portal to distribute CARES Act funds to state, local, and tribal governments
On April 13, the Department of Treasury initiated a web portal to quickly distribute CARES Act funds to eligible state, local, and tribal governments to help them recover expenditures incurred due to the Covid-19 public health emergency. Eligible governments must register through the portal and can expect funds to arrive in designated accounts as quickly as 24 hours afterward. Each state will receive half of its allotted funds in the state’s first disbursement, and the other half prior to April 24. Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin said of the Treasury’s launch of the web portal, “we have moved with unprecedented speed to get these funds to those who need them a week ahead of schedule.” For additional information, visit the Treasury’s website here.