InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
SEC issues whistleblower awards totaling over $5.2 million
On December 22, the SEC announced a more than $1.6 million award to a whistleblower whose critical information and assistance led to a successful SEC enforcement action. According to the redacted order, the whistleblower provided ongoing assistance to SEC staff as well as “original information that solidified their suspicions about certain defendants’ fraudulent” actions despite concerns about personal safety.
Earlier, on December 18, the SEC announced whistleblower awards totaling over $3.6 million in three separate enforcement actions. According to the first redacted order, the SEC awarded a whistleblower more than $1.8 million for voluntarily providing significant information and substantial assistance to SEC staff in a successful enforcement action. The whistleblower provided information—which “revealed a hard to detect fraudulent scheme” leading to the return of millions of dollars to harmed investors—and also “took immediate steps to mitigate the harm to investors and suffered hardships for doing so.”
In the second redacted order, the SEC awarded a whistleblower over $1.2 million for providing information leading to a successful enforcement action, although the Commission noted that the award amount was impacted after it determined the whistleblower “was culpable for actively participating in and financially benefiting from the fraudulent scheme” and “unreasonably delayed reporting” the scheme to the SEC.
In the third redacted order, a whistleblower was awarded more than $500,000 for providing significant information and ongoing assistance to SEC staff in a successful enforcement action. However, the SEC rejected the whistleblower’s claim that a higher award amount was warranted after it determined, among other things, that the whistleblower “unreasonably delayed reporting the misconduct for several years while investors were being harmed.”
The SEC has now paid approximately $736 million to 128 individuals since the inception of the program.
Massachusetts targets trading platform for aggressive tactics
On December 16, the enforcement section of the Massachusetts Securities Division filed an administrative complaint against a broker-dealer online trading platform alleging the company violated various state laws by using “aggressive tactics” to gain inexperienced investors. According to the complaint, the company, among other things, (i) used advertising techniques, including using young actors, to target younger individuals (with a median customer age around 31 years old) with little to no investment experience; (ii) failed to implement policies and procedures that were “[r]easonably [d]esigned to [p]revent and [r]espond to [o]utages and [d]isruptions on its [t]rading [p]latform,” resulting in nearly 70 outages throughout 2020; (iii) used “gamification strategies,” such as confetti raining down on the screen after a trade or requiring customers to “tap” a fake debit card to increase their position on the waitlist, to “lure customers into consistent participation” with the platform; and (iv) failed to review and supervise, in accordance with its own procedures, the approval of options trading accounts. The complaint asserts that the company’s tactics failed to adhere to the fiduciary conduct standard required of broker-dealers in the state of Massachusetts since the adoption of amendments in March, with enforcement beginning on September 1. Massachusetts is seeking an injunction, restitution, disgorgement, and administrative fines.
SEC awards whistleblower with audit responsibilities more than $300,000
On December 14, the SEC announced a more than $300,000 whistleblower award in connection with a successful enforcement action. According to the redacted order, in connection with the whistleblower’s audit-related responsibilities, the whistleblower became aware of potential securities law violations and voluntarily provided original information that contributed significantly to the enforcement action. The whistleblower also met with enforcement staff numerous times, helped to identify potential witnesses, and “aggressively attempted to remedy the misconduct and suffered a unique hardship.” The SEC notes in its press release that while individuals with audit or compliance responsibilities are generally ineligible for awards, “a whistleblower who reasonably believes that an entity is engaging in conduct that would impede the investigation falls within one of the exceptions to that rule.” This is the fourth award paid to a whistleblower with internal audit or compliance-related responsibilities.
The SEC has now paid approximately $731 million to 124 individuals since the inception of the program.
FINRA fines firm for AML and due diligence violations
On December 4, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) entered into a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent (AWC), fining a New York-based member firm $55,000 for allegedly failing to implement a reasonable anti-money laundering (AML) program for transactions involving low-priced securities. The firm also allegedly failed to establish a due diligence program for monitoring and reporting “known or suspected money laundering activity conducted through or involving correspondent accounts for foreign financial institutions.” According to FINRA, the firm failed to, among other things, (i) “include reasonable procedures for the surveillance of potentially suspicious trading in low-priced securities,” such as listing “some of the most relevant red flags”; (ii) ensure its surveillance reports and tools were “reasonably designed to detect and cause the reporting of potentially suspicious activity”; and (iii) reasonably respond to red flags received from a clearing firm related to potentially suspicious activity. FINRA also claimed that the firm failed to identify all of its foreign financial institution accounts (FFIs) due to a lack of systems or processes to do so. Specifically, the firm allegedly failed to review 33 correspondent accounts for FFIs, nor did it identify 15 of these 33 accounts as FFIs. As a result, the firm allegedly violated FINRA Rules 3310(b) and 2010. The firm neither admitted nor denied the findings set forth in the AWC agreement but agreed to pay the fine, address identified deficiencies in its programs to ensure compliance with its AML obligations, and provide a certification of compliance with FINRA Rule 3310.
Restaurant chain to pay SEC $125,000 for misleading Covid-19 disclosures
On December 4, the SEC announced a settlement with a national restaurant chain for allegedly making misleading disclosures about the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on its business operations. According to the order, in the restaurant’s Form 8-Ks filed on March 23 and April 3, the restaurant disclosed that it was “operating sustainably at present under this [off-premise] model” (referring to its to-go and delivery services). However, the SEC asserts that the restaurant did not disclose that it was “losing approximately $6 million in cash per week; and that it had only approximately 16 weeks of cash remaining, even after the $90 million revolving credit facility borrowing,” nor did it disclose the letter it send to its landlords announcing it would not be paying April rent. The SEC asserts the disclosures were materially false and misleading and violated Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-11 and 12b-20 thereunder. Without admitting the findings, the restaurant agreed to pay $125,000 in civil money penalties. This is the first action the SEC has taken against a company for misleading investors
SEC issues whistleblower awards totaling nearly $3 million
On December 7, the SEC announced whistleblower awards to five individuals totaling nearly $3 million for information provided in three different enforcement actions. According to the first redacted order, the SEC awarded a whistleblower nearly $1.8 million for voluntarily providing original information to the Commission leading to a successful enforcement action. The whistleblower, a company insider, provided detailed information that would have been difficult to detect in the absence of the tip and “provided extraordinary assistance” to Commission staff, which resulted in the return of money to harmed investors.
In the second redacted order, the SEC awarded two whistleblowers a total of approximately $750,000. The first whistleblower received a roughly $500,000 award for providing “credible [and] high quality” information directly to enforcement staff, which prompted the opening of an investigation and resulted in a successful enforcement action. The second whistleblower received approximately $250,000 for providing new information towards the end of the investigation “that resulted in the inclusion of additional allegations in the Covered Action.” The SEC noted that both whistleblowers provided substantial assistance in the investigation, including participating in interviews and providing explanations and clarity on complex issues.
In the third redacted order, two whistleblowers were jointly awarded nearly $400,000 for providing information that prompted the opening of an investigation leading to a successful enforcement action. The SEC stated that the whistleblowers also “provided substantial and continuing assistance to [e]nforcement staff during the course of the investigation.”
The SEC has now paid approximately $731 million to 123 individuals since the inception of the program.
SEC announces whistleblower awards totaling over $6.9 million
On December 1, the SEC announced a joint award of over $6 million to two whistleblowers whose information and assistance led to a successful SEC enforcement and related actions. According to the redacted order, the information led to “actions related to a complex [redacted] scheme involving multiple individuals and tens of millions of dollars in ill-gotten gains.” Moreover, the whistleblowers “substantially assisted” the SEC and another agency by “submitting information and documents, participating in interviews, and identifying key individuals involved in the misconduct.”
Earlier on November 19, the SEC announced a whistleblower award of over $900,000 in connection with an ongoing overseas securities investigation. According to the redacted order, the whistleblower provided “significant and timely information” to the Commission, which expanded and expedited the investigation and resulted in Commission charges. Additionally, the whistleblower “identified alleged violations that were occurring overseas, some of which would have been difficult to detect in the absence of [the whistleblower’s] information.”
The SEC has now paid a total of $728 million to 118 individuals since the inception of the program.
SEC awards $1.1 million to whistleblower
On November 13, the SEC announced a whistleblower award of over $1.1 million in connection with a successful enforcement action. According to the redacted order, the whistleblower provided information to the agency during an active investigation that led the SEC to inquire into different conduct. Additionally, the whistleblower “provided exemplary and continuing assistance” to the SEC, saving the agency time and resources. Lastly, the information and assistance was “critical” in order for the SEC to “bring an emergency action before assets could be dissipated.”
The SEC has now paid approximately $720 million to 113 individuals since the inception of the program.
President Trump issues Executive Order prohibiting securities investments that finance Chinese military companies
On November 12, President Trump issued an Executive Order (E.O.) on “Addressing the Threat from Securities Investments that Finance Communist Chinese Military Companies.” The E.O. generally prohibits “any transaction in publicly traded securities, or any securities that are derivative of, or are designed to provide investment exposure to such securities, of any Chinese military company. . .by any US person.” The E.O. establishes the deadlines for divestment of investments in companies currently listed as Chinese military companies as well as companies that later may be added to the list of Chinese military companies pursuant to Section 1237, or those that the Secretary of the Treasury publicly lists as meeting the criteria set forth in Section 1237(b).
Among other things, the prohibitions apply “except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, order, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to the order, and not withstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the date of the order.” The E.O. also prohibits any transactions by U.S. persons or within the United States that evade or avoid, have the purpose of evading or avoiding, cause a violation of, or attempt to violate the provisions set forth in the order, as well as any conspiracy to violate any of these prohibitions. Additionally, the Secretary of Treasury—after consulting with heads of other executive departments as deemed appropriate—is authorized to take actions, including promulgating rules and regulations, to carry out the purposes of the E.O.
SEC issues two separate whistleblower awards totaling over $4.3 million
On November 5, the SEC announced two separate whistleblower awards totaling over $4.3 million. According to the first redacted order, the SEC awarded a whistleblower more than $3.6 million for (i) providing information that alerted enforcement staff to misconduct occurring abroad that would otherwise “have been difficult to detect”; (ii) providing “substantial and ongoing assistance” to enforcement staff, including traveling to another country to meet with staff in person at the whistleblower’s own expense and providing “extensive supporting documentation”; and (iii) suffering hardships due to the whistleblowing. The SEC further noted in the order that while the whistleblower’s “ministerial role in the underlying misconduct” was considered, the Commission did not reduce the award for culpability as the whistleblower “took exceptional steps to report the misconduct from abroad and provided extraordinary assistance.”
In the second redacted order, the SEC awarded $750,000 to a whistleblower for providing significant information that led to a successful enforcement action. According to the SEC, while the covered action was already open when the whistleblower provided the original information, the whistleblower’s information caused enforcement staff to investigate different conduct, which ultimately formed the basis for the covered action. The whistleblower also met with Commission staff in person and explained “the likely mechanics of the fraudulent scheme.”
The SEC has now paid approximately $719 million to 112 individuals since the inception of the program.