InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
FTC Chief Ramirez Announces Resignation
On January 13, the FTC announced that Chairwoman Edith Ramirez will be stepping down effective February 10. Chairwoman Ramirez was appointed by President Barack Obama and has served as a commissioner since April 2010. She became chairwoman in March 2013, after former FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz resigned. Her departure means that President-elect Donald Trump will have the chance to fill three vacancies at the agency.
European Commission Publishes Draft ePrivacy Regulation
Commission announced the release of its Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Privacy and Electronic Communications (Proposed Regulation), which is set to repeal Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy Directive). The Proposed Regulation as discussed previously on InfoBytesis intended to update the current rules to keep up with technical developments and adapting them to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Among other things, the Proposed Regulation will expand the scope of the ePrivacy rules to include internet-based voice and internet-messaging services, and to cover the content of communications, including metadata such as the time and location of a call. Furthermore, with regards to cookies, the Proposed Regulation does not require the consent of the user for non-privacy intrusive cookies, which either improve internet experience or measure the number of visitors to a specific website. The proposed Regulation also includes an opt-in requirement for telemarketing calls, unless national laws provide the recipient with a right to object. The Proposed Regulation also contains language extending the remedies currently provided under the GDPR. Once passed, the Proposed Regulation would become effective on May 25, 2018. Links to other related documents and information may be accessed through the following links:
CFPB Publishes Rule Implementing Civil Penalty Inflation Adjustments
On January 12, the CFPB published a final rule adjusting upward the maximum amount of each civil penalty within its jurisdiction, as required by provisions of the Inflation Adjustment Act and OMB Guidance. As explained in the rule, the new penalty amounts for 2017 are calculated by multiplying the corresponding 2016 penalty by a “cost-of-living adjustment” multiplier—which for 2017 has been set by the OMB at 1.01636—and then rounding to the nearest dollar. The new penalty amounts apply to civil penalties assessed after January 15, 2017.
CFPB Proposes Amending Ethical Standards for Employees
On January 10, the CFPB issued a notice of proposed rulemaking concerning amendments to its existing Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees. Among other things, the proposed rule would amend CFPB Ethics Regulations that address: (i) outside employment for covered employees; (ii) Bureau employee ownership or control of certain securities; (iii) restrictions on seeking, obtaining, or renegotiating credit; and (iv) disqualification requirements based on existing indebtedness. The proposed rule is also intended to clarify certain definitions. Comments on the proposal must be received on or before February 9.
Special Inspector General for TARP Issues Report on "Hardest Hit Fund"
On January 12, the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP) announced the release of its report on TARP’s “Hardest Hit Fund” (HHF). Created in 2010, the HHF provides a temporary safety net to help save the homes of unemployed and underemployed Americans in 19 states deemed to be the hardest-hit areas of the country. Among other things, the report noted that a majority of the more than 160,000 people denied funds through the program earned less than $30,000. The report notes that SIGTARP is unable to determine why denial rates for homeowners making less than $30,000 are so high, in part, because state agencies' records are non-existent, missing, or incomplete. Indeed, according to the report, some state agencies were unable to provide “even basic aggregate information about why homeowners were denied, let alone a specific reason for each person turned away.” The report emphasized, among other things, the need for all such records-related deficiencies be “immediately remedied.” The report also recommended that state agencies “remove unnecessary restrictions for participation in the program.”
CFPB Orders Medical Debt Collection Law Firms to Refund $577,135 to Consumers
On January 9, the CFPB entered into a Consent Order and Stipulation against two medical debt-collection law firms and their president for alleged violations of the FDCPA and FCRA. Based on these allegations, the CFPB ordered the Respondents to provide $577,135 in relief to affected consumers, correct their business practices, and pay a $78,800 civil money penalty. According to the allegations set forth in the consent order, between January 2012 and August 2016, debt collectors working for the firms violated the FDCPA by giving the false impression that the firm’s “Demand Letters were from an attorney or that the firm’s attorneys were meaningfully involved in reviewing the consumer’s case or had reached a professional judgment that sending a Demand Letter or making a collection call was warranted.” The Bureau also found that the firms notarized consumer affidavits for use in debt-collection lawsuits without properly verifying the truth of the signature. The CFPB also alleged that the firms violated FCRA’s Regulation V by failing to establish, implement, and periodically review and update reasonable written policies and procedures regarding the accuracy and integrity of consumer information furnished to consumer reporting agencies.
London-based Bank Agrees to $32 Million Settlement with OCC Concerning Faulty Foreclosure Claims
On January 11, the OCC reported that it has ordered a large London-based bank to pay $32.5 million to settle claims that the bank failed to properly follow the regulator’s orders to improve mortgage foreclosure practices that led to borrowers being harmed after the 2008 credit crisis. Specifically, the OCC had accused the bank in 2015 of failing to meet the demands it had agreed to, and the agency imposed certain additional restrictions on the company’s mortgage-servicing abilities until it fixed the alleged shortcomings. The regulator also noted that the bank had failed to properly file documents in certain bankruptcy cases after the orders (for which it was ordered to pay $3.5 million in remediation to borrowers). The OCC confirmed, however, that the bank is now in compliance with all OCC orders related to the alleged foreclosure practices.
OFAC Settles With Non-U.S. Company for Apparent Violation of Iran Sanctions
On January 12, Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) announced a $17,500 settlement agreement with Aban Offshoe Limited ("Aban") of Chennai, India, in connection with an alleged violation of Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations. The alleged violation arises out of events that occurred in June 2008, when Aban's Singapore subsidiary allegedly placed an order for oil rig supplies from a vendor in the United States with the intended purpose of re-exporting these supplies from the United Arab Emirates to a jack-up oil drilling rig located in the South Pars Gas Fields in Iranian territorial waters. OFAC noted, among other things, that the alleged violation constitutes a non-egregious case, but that Aban did not voluntarily self-disclose the apparent violation.
FDIC Announces New Regulatory Actions Against Florida-based Bank
On December 30, the FDIC announced new regulatory actions against a Florida-based bank. Along with the Florida Office of Financial Regulation, the FDIC issued a new Consent Order against the $121.5 million-asset bank, based on allegations that the bank had engaged in “unsafe or unsound” banking practices, or practices which constituted a violation of law or regulation in the following areas: (i) weakness in asset quality, (ii) capital adequacy, earnings, (iii) management effectiveness, (iv) liquidity, (v) sensitivity to market risk, and (vi) compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).
Among other things, the Order notes that the bank currently falls short of FDIC requirements for qualifying as “well capitalized,” qualifying merely as “adequately capitalized,” and therefore must boost its capital levels or face continued restrictions on its operations. The Order also states that the bank—which consented to the Order without admitting or denying the charges—now has 120 days to meet its capital requirements and 60 days to submit a capital plan to both: (i) achieve and maintain the capital requirements; and (ii) provide for a contingency plan to sell or merge the bank.
FINRA Fines Brokerage Firm $5.75M for Lax Anti-Money Laundering Program
On December 28, FINRA entered into an acceptance, waiver, and consent (AWC) agreement with a Puerto-Rican-based brokerage firm based upon allegations that the firm’s anti-money laundering (AML) program “was not reasonably designed to achieve and monitor compliance with the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act.” In deciding to levy a $5.75 million fine, FINRA noted, among other things, that the firm improperly “relied on manual supervisory review of securities transactions” that was “not sufficiently focused on AML risks.” The firm neither admitted nor denied the findings set forth in the AWC agreement, but agreed to address deficiencies in their AML program within 180 days. According to a firm spokeswoman, the firm is “pleased to have this matter from 2013 resolved and we continue to improve, manage and monitor our AML efforts.”