InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
Rhode Island attorney general: CARES Act recovery rebates exempt from seizure
On April 28, the attorney general of Rhode Island issued guidance to financial institutions, credit unions, creditors and debt collectors announcing that, in the attorney general’s view, all CARES Act recovery rebates are exempt from attachment and execution under Rhode Island law. The attorney general also warned that if a creditor attempts to attach a CARES Act recovery rebate, the attorney general’s office may bring a civil action or seek injunctive relief.
Rhode Island regulator extends guidance for lenders
On April 28, the Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation, Banking Division, amended previous guidance (previously covered here) issued to mortgage loan originators, lenders, loan brokers and exempt company registrants. The previous guidance permitted working at home, even if the home is located outside of Rhode Island or is not a licensed branch. The department extended this guidance until June 30, 2020.
Pennsylvania State Department revises guidance for real estate industry
On April 28, the Pennsylvania Department of State issued revised guidance for real estate professionals, appraisers, notaries, title companies, and home inspectors in light of the Covid-19-related closures of non-essential businesses. The revised guidance limits in-person residential real estate activities to transactions related to existing homes under contract prior to March 18, 2020, new construction homes under a contract calling for closing or delivery on or after March 18, 2020, where a buyer can demonstrate that they had entered into an agreement for sale of their prior residence prior to March 18, 2020 or where a property subject to sale, home equity loan or home equity refinancing is located in certain regions of Pennsylvania.
SEC charges company and CEO for misleading statements concerning N95 masks
On April 28, the SEC announced that it filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida against a company and its CEO (defendants) for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making false and misleading statements concerning their ability to source and supply N95 masks for the Covid-19 virus. The SEC alleges that the defendants’ actions sought to mislead investors because they “never had either a single order from any buyer to purchase masks, or a single contract with any manufacturer or supplier to obtain masks, let alone any masks actually in its possession.” Following regulatory inquiries (and an SEC March 26 order that temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the company), the SEC alleges in the complaint that the CEO issued a press release stating that the company never had masks available to sell. The SEC seeks injunctive relief and civil penalties against the defendant, as well as an officer-and-director bar against the CEO.
HUD OIG issues Covid-19 guidance to homeowners
On April 28, the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Office of Inspector General issued a bulletin outlining Federal Housing Administration guidance to servicers and borrowers regarding implementing the forbearance requirements of the CARES Act. The office issued the bulletin based on a review of information that the top 30 FHA mortgage servicers provide on their websites, which the office found to be incomplete, outdated, inconsistent, or unclear.
New York guidance excludes debt collection from essential businesses or entities
On April 28, New York updated its guidance on Executive Order 202.6 relating to determining whether a business enterprise is subject to a workforce reduction under recent executive orders addressing Covid-19. The updated guidance provides that essential financial institutions include banks or lending institutions, insurance, payroll, accounting, and services related to financial markets, with the exception of debt collection services.
South Carolina regulator issues guidance to mortgage brokers
On April 28, the South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs issued interim guidance to mortgage brokers on working remotely from unlicensed locations and extended the deadline for submitting the 2019 mortgage log. The department clarified that, until May 31, 2020, licensed mortgage loan originators are permitted to work from home, whether in South Carolina or another state, even if the home is not a licensed branch. The department also reported that it has deferred the filing deadline for the 2019 mortgage log required of mortgage broker companies until June 1, 2020.
Virginia outlines student loan servicer requirements
On April 22, the Virginia legislature enacted SB 77, which requires entities servicing student loans in the Commonwealth to be licensed by the State Corporation Commission (SCC). Notably, banks, savings institutions, credit unions, and financial institutions regulated under 12 U.S.C. § 2002 are exempt from the licensing requirements. In addition to outlining specific licensing requirements, SB 77 states that non-exempt student loan servicers must also refrain from, among other things, (i) engaging in any unfair or deceptive act or practice in connection with the servicing of a qualified education loan by misrepresenting the amount, nature, or terms of any loan fees or payments, the terms and conditions of the loan agreement, or the borrower’s loan obligations; (ii) misapplying loan payments to an outstanding balance; (iii) failing to report both the favorable and unfavorable payment history of a borrower to a nationally recognized consumer credit bureau at least once a year provided the loan servicer regularly reports such information; (iv) failing to communicate with a borrower’s authorized representative; and (v) making false statements or omitting material facts in connection with information provided to the SCC or another government authority. Student loan servicers must also comply with other requirements, such as evaluating qualified borrowers for income-driven repayment programs, and responding to borrowers’ written inquiries within 30 days.
Additionally, SB 77 creates a private cause of action available to “[a]ny person who suffers damage as a result of the failure of a qualified education loan servicer to comply” with the bill’s requirements or with applicable federal student loan servicing laws and regulations. The bill further provides that violations are subject to a civil penalty not exceeding $2,500 and are considered prohibited practices under the Virginia Consumer Protection Act. SB 77 has a delayed effective date of July 1, 2021; however, the SCC will begin accepting applications starting on or before March 1, 2021.
Virginia caps interest and fees charged under short-term loans
On April 22, the Virginia legislature enacted HB 789, which amends certain provisions of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (VCPA) related to consumer lending. Specifically, the provisions increase the maximum short-term loan from $500 to $2,500, and sets the duration of these loans to a minimum of four months and a maximum of 24 months, subject to exceptions. Interest and fees that may be charged on a short-term loan are capped at an annual rate of 36 percent, plus a maintenance fee. In addition, licensed lenders are required to make a reasonable attempt to verify a borrower’s eligibility and may not collect fees and charges that exceed 50 percent of the original loan amount if such amount is $1,500 or less, or 60 percent of the original loan amount if the original amount is greater than $1,500. Additional amendments include provisions that (i) update the requirements for motor vehicle title loans, including prohibiting loans to borrowers with outstanding title loans, and prohibiting licensees from collecting or receiving credit insurance premiums and charges for ancillary products, among other things; (ii) make a violation of the bill’s provisions a prohibited practice subject to enforcement under the VCPA; (iii) allow licensed lenders to use the services of access partners, subject to certain conditions; (iv) provide that installment loans must be between $300 and $35,000 to be paid in substantially equal installment payments, with terms of no fewer than six and no more than 120 months; and (iv) outline short-term loan advertising requirements. Persons required to be licensed under these provisions must apply for a license on or before October 1, 2020. Licenses will take effect January 1, 2021 for those issued by the State Corporation Commission prior to this date.
FDIC, Fed extend comment period on proposed living will guidance
On April 27, the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board announced a 30-day extension to the comment period for the agencies’ proposal to update resolution plan guidance for certain large foreign banking organizations (FBOs). As previously covered by InfoBytes, FBOs are required to submit resolution plans—also known as “living wills”—which detail the strategic plans for their U.S. operations and subsidiaries for rapid and orderly resolution in bankruptcy in the event that the banks fail or fall under material financial distress. The proposed guidance, issued in March, focuses on the FBOs’ derivatives and trading activities and payment, clearing, and settlement activities, and provides additional resolution plan expectations. Comments will now be accepted through June 4. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the agencies also state that other upcoming deadlines associated with the resolution planning process may be adjusted.