InfoBytes Blog
Class actions accuse banks of prioritizing existing customers and high-dollar loans
On April 23, a small business filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against a large bank for allegedly ignoring the CARES Act’s Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) “regulations for administering, processing, and handling” loan applications. The complaint claims that the bank disregarded a requirement to process loans in the order that they were submitted, and also contends that the bank made false and misleading statements to conceal the fact that high dollar loans were moved to the front of the processing queue in order for the bank to obtain higher fees. The class action seeks certification of the class, injunctive relief, disgorgement, and punitive and statutory damages, among other things.
On April 22 in a separate class action based on similar facts and allegations, a small business owner filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against a different large bank. The business owner filed the motion in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division to prevent the bank from applying “illegal eligibility requirement[s]” to the Small Business Administration-guaranteed PPP loans. The motion claims that the bank was only processing loan applications from the bank’s existing business customers in disregard for the CARES Act and Interim Final Rule instruction to administer the PPP loans to all customers, existing and new. In addition to the temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction, the motion requests that the bank issue a public statement that their existing business customer eligibility requirement is no longer in effect. In an order issued on April 29, the court denied the business owner’s motion for a temporary restraining order and deferred ruling on the preliminary injunction until after a hearing.