Skip to main content
Menu Icon
Close

InfoBytes Blog

Financial Services Law Insights and Observations

Filter

Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.

  • South Dakota enacts new money transmission law, aligning the law to the Money Transmission Modernization Act

    Recently, the Governor of South Dakota, Kristi Noem, signed into law SB 58, which amended and repealed many parts of the state’s money transmission law enacted in 2023 to bring the law more into alignment with a model Money Transmitter Model Law. South Dakota was one of several states that have enacted the model law since 2022 (covered by InfoBytes here, here, here, and here), to harmonize the licensing and regulation of money transmitters between states.

    Among many other new provisions, the Act defined “money” to mean a “medium of exchange that is authorized or adopted by the United States or a foreign government” but excluded any central bank digital currency. Additionally, the Act provided for several exemptions, such as the “agent of a payee” exemption, which exempted an agent who collects and processes payment from a payor to a payee for goods and services other than money transmission itself from the Act’s coverage, under certain specified circumstances. 

    The Act also imposed a licensing regime on persons engaged in the business of money transmission and authorizes and encourages the South Dakota Director of the Division of Banking (Director) to coordinate the licensing provisions with other states and utilize the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System for the license applications, maintenance, and renewals. SB 58 amended the required surety bond amount from $100,000 to $500,000, to the greater of $100,000 or an amount equal to the licensee’s average daily money transmission liability in South Dakota for the most recent three-month period, up to a maximum of $500,000, or if the licensee’s tangible net worth exceeds 10% of total assets, $100,000.

    Once a license application is completed, the Director will have 120 days to approve or deny the application. In addition to the license application process, the Act also outlined the criteria for renewing, maintaining, and changing control of the license, as well as the licensee’s responsibility to keep records and maintain permissible investments. Notably, if a licensee is transmitting virtual currencies, then the licensee must “hold like-kind virtual currencies of the same volume as that held by the licensee but that is obligated to consumers” instead of the permissible investments otherwise listed under the Act. The Act will go into effect on July 1.

    Licensing State Issues Money Service / Money Transmitters CBDC South Dakota Digital Assets

  • District Court rules nonsignatory to credit card agreement cannot compel arbitration in debt collection case

    Courts

    On July 11, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California denied a law firm defendant’s motion to compel arbitration in an FDCPA case. According to the order, the plaintiff’s credit card, opened with a South Dakota-based bank, was stolen and charged more than $8,500. The plaintiff claimed that the original creditor did not investigate, refused to remove the charges, and attempted to collect on the debt. The creditor filed suit against the plaintiff to collect, and the plaintiff sought to move the case to arbitration. The creditor placed the account with the defendant, a debt collection law firm, whom the plaintiff then sued in federal court alleging unlawful collection attempts. The defendant sought to compel arbitration, based on the arbitration clause in the original agreement between the plaintiff and the creditor. The district court held that South Dakota law governed the card agreement, and a court ruling from that state’s Supreme Court held that nonsignatories to an arbitration agreement can compel arbitration only where (i) the plaintiff alleged “substantially interdependent and concerted misconduct” between the signatory and nonsignatory; or (ii) the plaintiff’s claims against the nonsignatory arises out of the agreement. The district court stated that the plaintiff did not allege, nor could the district court infer, that the defendant worked “in concert” with the creditor to unlawfully collect the debt, but rather that it did not follow reasonable procedures under the FDCPA. Additionally, the district court held that the plaintiff’s claims did not arise out of the arbitration provision. Therefore, the nonsignatory defendant could not rely on the provision to compel arbitration.  

    Courts State Issues South Dakota FDCPA Debt Collection Credit Cards Consumer Finance Arbitration

  • South Dakota extends work from home guidance

    State Issues

    On September 1, South Dakota’s Division of Banking updated Memorandum 11-003 (previously covered here and here) to extend the time period in which licensed mortgage loan originators can work from home until December 31, 2021, so long as certain conditions relating to data and records security are met.

    State Issues Covid-19 South Dakota Mortgage Licensing Loan Origination Mortgage Origination

  • South Dakota Division of Banking extends work from home guidance

    State Issues

    On June 1, South Dakota’s Division of Banking updated Memorandum 11-003 (previously covered here) to extend the time period in which licensed mortgage loan originators can work from home until December 31, 2020, so long as certain conditions relating to data and records security are met.

    State Issues Covid-19 South Dakota Licensing Mortgage Licensing Mortgage Origination Mortgages

  • South Dakota Division of Banking issues work from home guidance

    State Issues

    On March 12, the South Dakota Division of Banking issued Memorandum 11-003 providing interim regulatory guidance allowing licensed mortgage loan originators to work from home, whether located in South Dakota or another state, even if the home is not a previously authorized location, so long as certain conditions are met.

    State Issues Mortgages Loan Origination Licensing Covid-19 South Dakota

  • South Dakota regulator encourages pandemic planning

    State Issues

    On March 12, the South Dakota Division of Banking issued a memorandum encouraging state-chartered banks to review recent pandemic planning guidance issued by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council and then revise or establish appropriate pandemic plans. The Division advised that the plans should be integrated into business continuity plans and consider ways to maintain essential financial services for customers while limiting impact to employees. Finally, the Division indicated that it will monitor the impact of Covid-19 and alter onsite examination activities as needed.

    State Issues South Dakota State Regulators FFIEC Business Continuity Consumer Finance Covid-19

Upcoming Events